Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, any mothers and fathers who don't want to see their baby, who wasn't going to live, slowly slowly die in agonizing pain need to leave the red states ASAP.
It's horrid.
Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
1. The couple worried they could be arrested if they sought an out of state abortion and voiced concern about ensuring they could be there for their existing child
2. How sad of a world we are in that a woman would have to travel out of state for ethically appropriate healthcare
+1
It also puts the healthcare of women in the remaining free states at risk. There aren’t that many obstetricians to go around.
Anyone traveling to a state where abortion is still legal needs to show their voting record. If they voted GOP, nope, no taking services. You bought the ticket, you take the ride.
On the other hand, if this woman’s family starts voting for pro life candidates, that could be a lot of people changing sides. Milo’s parents, her parents, her 6 siblings, their spouses. That’s almost 20 people without getting into extended family, church, or friends. This is how change happens. Unfortunately because of republicans, a lot of babies are going to have to die, families will go into debt to pay for hospital bills that shouldn’t have been needed, some women will lose their fertility and lives along the way, and it’s going to break families apart with the stress of dying children, debt, and grief. But they will have won for a little while.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
1. The couple worried they could be arrested if they sought an out of state abortion and voiced concern about ensuring they could be there for their existing child
2. How sad of a world we are in that a woman would have to travel out of state for ethically appropriate healthcare
+1
It also puts the healthcare of women in the remaining free states at risk. There aren’t that many obstetricians to go around.
Anyone traveling to a state where abortion is still legal needs to show their voting record. If they voted GOP, nope, no taking services. You bought the ticket, you take the ride.
On the other hand, if this woman’s family starts voting for pro life candidates, that could be a lot of people changing sides. Milo’s parents, her parents, her 6 siblings, their spouses. That’s almost 20 people without getting into extended family, church, or friends. This is how change happens. Unfortunately because of republicans, a lot of babies are going to have to die, families will go into debt to pay for hospital bills that shouldn’t have been needed, some women will lose their fertility and lives along the way, and it’s going to break families apart with the stress of dying children, debt, and grief. But they will have won for a little while.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
1. The couple worried they could be arrested if they sought an out of state abortion and voiced concern about ensuring they could be there for their existing child
2. How sad of a world we are in that a woman would have to travel out of state for ethically appropriate healthcare
+1
It also puts the healthcare of women in the remaining free states at risk. There aren’t that many obstetricians to go around.
Anyone traveling to a state where abortion is still legal needs to show their voting record. If they voted GOP, nope, no taking services. You bought the ticket, you take the ride.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
1. The couple worried they could be arrested if they sought an out of state abortion and voiced concern about ensuring they could be there for their existing child
2. How sad of a world we are in that a woman would have to travel out of state for ethically appropriate healthcare
+1
It also puts the healthcare of women in the remaining free states at risk. There aren’t that many obstetricians to go around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
1. The couple worried they could be arrested if they sought an out of state abortion and voiced concern about ensuring they could be there for their existing child
2. How sad of a world we are in that a woman would have to travel out of state for ethically appropriate healthcare
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
It was in previous articles. Sorry your sources are poor reporters of the truth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
That wasn’t in this article.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Because she could have left to get the abortion. Because people raised money for the family to do so. Because they chose not to.
Anonymous wrote:I’m really not interested in hearing what a father thinks. Why is he speaking for the mother? Why don’t he let her speak for herself?
Anonymous wrote:Was this the family they profiled several weeks ago?
So messed up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pro-lifers, where are you? Always so quiet when folks post these stories. Nothing to say here?
Radio silence.
Blessed be the fruit.
What does that mean?