Anonymous wrote:Modern day Mozart. Chopin would be thrilled with those lyrics

I bet you are a load of fun at parties.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

It doesn’t matter. The song clearly is about a man and woman.

No it’s not. It’s about a man on the lowdown and how that’s such a turnon to the singer.

No it actually is. Sam didn't write the song. It was written by a songwriting team. (Note: It was initially intended for another musician.)

The songs sounds like it was meant to be performed by an R&B artist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

It doesn’t matter. The song clearly is about a man and woman.

No it’s not. It’s about a man on the lowdown and how that’s such a turnon to the singer.

No it actually is. Sam didn't write the song. It was written by a songwriting team. (Note: It was initially intended for another musician.)

Modern day Mozart. Chopin would be thrilled with those lyrics

It’s a catchy song but if you understand the meaning it’s sad. I always feel really bad for women in this situation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where the hell did you get that it was about a gay romance? Did you even listen to the lyrics?

I thought that at first too. It seemed more in line with Sam Smith's brand to be calling something like that out.

Yeah but like I said, did you even listen to the lyrics? Kim Petras is clearly the other woman and is calling her lover daddy and expecting gifts and talking about jumping under the covers with the man. How would you ever get that this is about a gay romance?

Because she is trans. And because the queer singer is singing sexually about it.

You are ignorant.

Nah, that poster is observant. Both singers are not cis gender - they are both gender different.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where the hell did you get that it was about a gay romance? Did you even listen to the lyrics?

I thought that at first too. It seemed more in line with Sam Smith's brand to be calling something like that out.

Yeah but like I said, did you even listen to the lyrics? Kim Petras is clearly the other woman and is calling her lover daddy and expecting gifts and talking about jumping under the covers with the man. How would you ever get that this is about a gay romance?

Because she is trans. And because the queer singer is singing sexually about it.

You are ignorant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

It doesn’t matter. The song clearly is about a man and woman.

No it’s not. It’s about a man on the lowdown and how that’s such a turnon to the singer.

What lyrics suggest that please? They were posted earlier in the thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where the hell did you get that it was about a gay romance? Did you even listen to the lyrics?

I thought that at first too. It seemed more in line with Sam Smith's brand to be calling something like that out.

Yeah but like I said, did you even listen to the lyrics? Kim Petras is clearly the other woman and is calling her lover daddy and expecting gifts and talking about jumping under the covers with the man. How would you ever get that this is about a gay romance?

Because she is trans. And because the queer singer is singing sexually about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

It doesn’t matter. The song clearly is about a man and woman.

No it’s not. It’s about a man on the lowdown and how that’s such a turnon to the singer.

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

It doesn’t matter. The song clearly is about a man and woman.

Anonymous wrote:But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

Sam Smith changed their pronouns and is non-binary. Gender, sex, identity are all changeable and mutable.

But Kim is trans. So that's another whole layer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where the hell did you get that it was about a gay romance? Did you even listen to the lyrics?

I thought that at first too. It seemed more in line with Sam Smith's brand to be calling something like that out.

Yeah but like I said, did you even listen to the lyrics? Kim Petras is clearly the other woman and is calling her lover daddy and expecting gifts and talking about jumping under the covers with the man. How would you ever get that this is about a gay romance?

I think PP is probably saying that, because Sam Smith appears to be gay that Sam would only sing about the things. (In reality, very few chart topping performers write their own music these days.)

Yes of course. So then the obvious answer is the PP didn’t listen to the actual lyrics of the song, but instead made a judgment based on the sexual orientation of the singer. That is like assuming gay actors can only play gay characters or vice versa. The PP is stupid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where the hell did you get that it was about a gay romance? Did you even listen to the lyrics?

I thought that at first too. It seemed more in line with Sam Smith's brand to be calling something like that out.

Yeah but like I said, did you even listen to the lyrics? Kim Petras is clearly the other woman and is calling her lover daddy and expecting gifts and talking about jumping under the covers with the man. How would you ever get that this is about a gay romance?

I think PP is probably saying that, because Sam Smith appears to be gay that Sam would only sing about the things. (In reality, very few chart topping performers write their own music these days.)