Anonymous wrote:If you are getting a look at the exact test your kid will be taking, then yes, this is cheating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the 1970s and 80s, kids were told that they couldn't/shouldn't study for the SAT. That it was a measure of their innate ability.
Look how far we've come.
No one I know has ever been told this. This is a knowledge test. OF COURSE you should prep.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't prep my DC and while they did well they didn't get into AAP, perhaps because enough families are prepping that it's raising the bar for local schools and making the cut off higher. There's definitely a risk in doing things the way you're supposed to. At the same time, I didn't want to force AAP if it's not an appropriate fit.
Another poster who doesn't get the first thing about Cogat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT is normed using a group of kids who have never been prepped for or even familiarized with the questions. Prepping your child may not be cheating per se, but it will lead to an inflated score relative to the kids taking it sight unseen.
The CogAT ceiling is very low, and even getting one extra problem correct can swing the score by a few points. The conventional wisdom is that prepping could increase your child's score at most around 10-15 points. For AAP admissions, this could be the difference between acceptance and rejection.
I guess technically, prepping is defeating the purpose of the test. But, parents who want their kids in AAP are foolish if they don't prep.
Source for your data?
This is for the WIAT (adult version of the WISC) rather than CogAT. The linked study shows that merely retaking - not hardcore prepping for - the WIAT 3 to 6 months after taking the original led to increases around 4-9 points in many sections. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22353021/
GMU, in their CogAT administration FAQ, states that the CogAT cannot be administered more often than once every 6 months, and that a more accurate assessment will occur for people who do not formally prepare their children for the test. https://cap.gmu.edu/group-testing/faq
Anonymous wrote:If it truly measured innate ability, then prepping wouldn't make any difference. If it doesn't measure innate ability, then perhaps it shouldn't be used as a litmus (or the only litmus) for which children are gifted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT is normed using a group of kids who have never been prepped for or even familiarized with the questions. Prepping your child may not be cheating per se, but it will lead to an inflated score relative to the kids taking it sight unseen.
The CogAT ceiling is very low, and even getting one extra problem correct can swing the score by a few points. The conventional wisdom is that prepping could increase your child's score at most around 10-15 points. For AAP admissions, this could be the difference between acceptance and rejection.
I guess technically, prepping is defeating the purpose of the test. But, parents who want their kids in AAP are foolish if they don't prep.
Source for your data?
Anonymous wrote:The CogAT is normed using a group of kids who have never been prepped for or even familiarized with the questions. Prepping your child may not be cheating per se, but it will lead to an inflated score relative to the kids taking it sight unseen.
The CogAT ceiling is very low, and even getting one extra problem correct can swing the score by a few points. The conventional wisdom is that prepping could increase your child's score at most around 10-15 points. For AAP admissions, this could be the difference between acceptance and rejection.
I guess technically, prepping is defeating the purpose of the test. But, parents who want their kids in AAP are foolish if they don't prep.
Anonymous wrote:It's cheating. And FCPS has figured out the solution: they are unimpressed by high test scores and may even penalize students. Now the GBRS, which is somewhat subjective, is much more heavily weighted.
There's no "punishment" for cheating. They're just little kids. But there are solutions. And FCPS has found one.
Anonymous wrote:In the 1970s and 80s, kids were told that they couldn't/shouldn't study for the SAT. That it was a measure of their innate ability.
Look how far we've come.