Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She is going to prison for her crimes - she cannot delay for ever. I am sure she feels greatly bonded to her kids, even more so with the impending separation. Who wouldn't?
The author feels surprise that she's a normal person. Of course she's a normal person! People tend to label criminals with all sorts of disorders to make themselves believe they would never do the same thing, but the reality is, no one can be 100% sure that they wouldn't commit a crime given the right environment. In that knowledge, it's a little immature to have a mob revilement session where we all dump on the convicted people. We're not so far apart as we might like to think.
She bullied one of her employees so badly that she drove him to suicide. She defrauded people out of millions of dollars and put people's lives at risk. She lied to people suffering from cancer, FFS. If she had not been stopped, she would have surely killed people, and SHE KNEW THIS THE WHOLE TIME. She spied on her enemies and threatened to tried to destroy their careers. Then she used her ill-gotten gains to live lavish lifestyle. This woman is a straight up sociopath. I can absolutely assure you that I would not "do the same thing" in any environment.
What in the world is wrong with you, PP?
Anonymous wrote:Whenever I think about how she harmed people, and that so many other narcs almost completely let her get away with it, I truly feel steam coming out of my ears.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you stop posting links that require a paywall. Gift link.
DP - but this should be a gift link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/business/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-interview.html?unlocked_article_code=C5ejc5SHP4-Db-EzJaelrMYv0HRTZFVZH6NpUwND95_0rzOi6q2h2ZIUi-o-LQtjWU--VettprlF8k7NM4WSuWcgcSHt46hBsLVLea9JfzJN7Vkr_qir_uCK_VBxPAX3kIXFrs9Ag-14MkWnm_USZcEqYOLyRcP8pcu7P3gaC1WwoDNCma_fqF9AtbKPldO6YB5kY-xtQ0nIJePbhu2WJdMVuvdstIYusXC1_LCbOQfOwCProT1a3CVBZsj5EadFxIr0XDaT7yhiJXlpIxybt1_5X4YiROsh6aJkpwZsi47PxgY_T8wGTHgZTRBsJ3JM69CtY3ZmZFXQWNEC2EOZKL8fYf9Pi1YvMStfboY&smid=url-share
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you stop posting links that require a paywall. Gift link.
Not op, but it's a subscription with paying for f you value journalism or want to keep up with the DC water cooler conversations.
It's an interesting attempt at a rebrand for sure!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you stop posting links that require a paywall. Gift link.
DP - but this should be a gift link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/business/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-interview.html?unlocked_article_code=C5ejc5SHP4-Db-EzJaelrMYv0HRTZFVZH6NpUwND95_0rzOi6q2h2ZIUi-o-LQtjWU--VettprlF8k7NM4WSuWcgcSHt46hBsLVLea9JfzJN7Vkr_qir_uCK_VBxPAX3kIXFrs9Ag-14MkWnm_USZcEqYOLyRcP8pcu7P3gaC1WwoDNCma_fqF9AtbKPldO6YB5kY-xtQ0nIJePbhu2WJdMVuvdstIYusXC1_LCbOQfOwCProT1a3CVBZsj5EadFxIr0XDaT7yhiJXlpIxybt1_5X4YiROsh6aJkpwZsi47PxgY_T8wGTHgZTRBsJ3JM69CtY3ZmZFXQWNEC2EOZKL8fYf9Pi1YvMStfboY&smid=url-share
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s interesting is that the author fell for her. She knew it was all fake, but Holmes is one of those people who can captivate an audience
None of it is fake. People are complex, that's all. Elizabeth Holmes did her best to attract investments (Steve Jobs turtlenecks, etc), which was very business savvy. She then lied to investors and went entirely over the legal line. It doesn't mean she does not have a motherly side.
I find this entire discussion to be actually very demeaning to women in high-powered careers: they need to project a certain way at work. Then they go home and enjoy a warmer aspect of their personality with their kids. It's entirely NORMAL.
But here this article, and this discussion, will associate such a dichotomy with criminality and possible psychopathy. It's incredibly damaging to working women to question why they behave differently at work than at home with their kids. Because essentially, this is what OP and the author are trying to do.
Have articles been written about males behaving differently at work and with their kids? Whether or not they are criminals? NO!
You can criticize this woman all you want for her crimes. But don't claim that just because you're seeing another side of her now, it's all put on and fake.
Anonymous wrote:
She is going to prison for her crimes - she cannot delay for ever. I am sure she feels greatly bonded to her kids, even more so with the impending separation. Who wouldn't?
The author feels surprise that she's a normal person. Of course she's a normal person! People tend to label criminals with all sorts of disorders to make themselves believe they would never do the same thing, but the reality is, no one can be 100% sure that they wouldn't commit a crime given the right environment. In that knowledge, it's a little immature to have a mob revilement session where we all dump on the convicted people. We're not so far apart as we might like to think.
Anonymous wrote:Can you stop posting links that require a paywall. Gift link.
Anonymous wrote:Why is this in Entertainment?