I prefer not changing too. I think people see only ASD and ADHD when they see neurodiversity because those are the loudest voices right now. I think special needs covers much more.Anonymous wrote:How about kids with special needs and disabilities. Covers everyone.
Anonymous wrote:
I have a son with 145 IQ, ADHD and ASD, and a daughter with "just" the high IQ, and I really would like this forum to understand that being gifted IS ALSO a special need, in that it comes with its own set of challenges that are outside of the range of normal.
So "neurodivergent" seems great, and "disabilities" seems great too. Regardless of whether you believe that ADHD is a disability (when it's severe, it most definitely is!), those two words seem to cover all the spectrum of neuropsychological situations that are outside the range of normal.
So I vote yes.
Anonymous wrote:When i'm chatting with another mom from school or someone else who doesn't know DS's official diagnosis, and the convo is casual enough that i don't feel like dropping in fancy diagnoses or formal terms (that can change the mood really fast), i just say that DS has "some additional needs" or "some special needs". Seems like use of the word "some" softens the term and is absolutely still an accurate description of what's going on (he DOES have some special or additional needs relative to other kids). It somehow seems a little less aggressive than saying "he is special needs".
I don't really give a shit about all the nomenclature though, and mostly like to keep diagnoses to ourselves. Much like if someone has some other medical disease, they don't go around dropping the diagnosis in every random conversation; but if it comes up organically (like, why you won't be able to attend that event next week) people would say "oh i've got some medical stuff going on....".
Anonymous wrote:
I have a son with 145 IQ, ADHD and ASD, and a daughter with "just" the high IQ, and I really would like this forum to understand that being gifted IS ALSO a special need, in that it comes with its own set of challenges that are outside of the range of normal.
So "neurodivergent" seems great, and "disabilities" seems great too. Regardless of whether you believe that ADHD is a disability (when it's severe, it most definitely is!), those two words seem to cover all the spectrum of neuropsychological situations that are outside the range of normal.
So I vote yes.
Anonymous wrote:Atypical needs
Anonymous wrote:Every single one of these terms was, at one point, the newfangled and sensitive replacement for its predecessor.
Even mentally re…, sorry, the “R” word.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember when disabled was considered an inappropriate term? We can’t keep chasing the latest fads on words.
Labels, Labels, Labels...
Anonymous wrote:How about kids with special needs and disabilities. Covers everyone.

Anonymous wrote:How about kids with special needs and disabilities. Covers everyone.