Anonymous wrote:OP, I think you may have missed the point of that thread you cited. It seems very unlikely that anyone was trying to say that everyone who works hard enough to get into Harvard is going to be miserable.
But what's undeniable is that the assumption by many parents, students, high schools, etc. that one needs to be admitted to an elite college like Harvard in order to have a successful and happy life is steering a lot of kids toward misery. Many, many kids sacrifice sleep, healthy eating, friends, fun, etc. in pursuit of being one of the 5% who will be admitted, and they end up in poor physical and mental health when they enter whichever college they end up attending. They'll be miserable if they get into Harvard or if they end up at Maryland.
Yes, the intensity is a positive for academic and professional success, but kids need to learn the important skill of recognizing when they've reached their limits. Research is showing that 50% of kids are highly stressed out on a daily basis, and 25% have medically diagnosable depression. And that almost always follows them to college and the workforce. Is that who we want in leadership positions in the coming decades?
This NYU study might help in understanding what's going on:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01028/full
Anonymous wrote:The premise of this story is false. NC State just reported the 7th student death this year alone. More people are miserable at lower level states than at ivies.
Anonymous wrote:Not all kids who go to prestigious colleges are miserable. But all kids whose parents are overly invested in the kids going to prestigious colleges are either miserable, insufferable, or both.
Anonymous wrote:My own college experience inclines me to disagree with the OP.
Think of it in a different context. Would you agree with “I’d rather have a happy kid playing a D3 sport than a miserable one at the Olympics.” It makes perfect sense that higher pressure, more “excellent” institutions can be more stressful.
Anonymous wrote:You left out the very important precursor: "You don't want to hear this, and probably cannot process it at this stage, but it is far better for her to develop a strong social sense of self, have fun and friendships, and feel in control of her own life than is is to go to any particular college." Those are they very things she's developing now by not focusing all her energy on getting into Harvard to please somebody else.
I don't think the poster was saying UMD would make the child less depressed than Harvard per se. It's the path to Harvard and the expectation to get into Harvard at the expense of self.So saying the depressed Harvard student would be depressed (or as depressed) at UMD isn't fair because the future college student is developing her sense of self and attending to her current and future mental health by not putting all effort and hope for her future on Harvard.
Agency is a big deal for teens. Have you looked into the work of Madeline Levine? https://madelinelevine.com/books/the-price-of-privilege/