Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From my observation, with no hard data to back this up, the success rate in ED2 is low. I don’t know if that’s because it isn’t offered many places so everyone ED2s the same schools, if kids shoot too high, or what.
What is interesting about ED2 is that the schools have the RD apps at the same time. So they are making the decision with a lot of information about the RD pool. Clearly ED2 applicants have an edge on the RD applicants since the yield is 100 percent. A marginal RD applicant prob squeaks in ED2
Anonymous wrote:From my observation, with no hard data to back this up, the success rate in ED2 is low. I don’t know if that’s because it isn’t offered many places so everyone ED2s the same schools, if kids shoot too high, or what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK let's do this with some hypotheticals. Suppose your child wants to attend a mid-sized college on the east coast with a business school. (I'm using all Catholic examples here to make it more apples:apples.) Your choices are (in order of difficulty of admission) Georgetown, BC, Villanova, Fordham, Providence. Let's say GU and BC are reaches, Villanova is a match, and Fordham and Providence are likelies.
Student decides their top choices are Georgetown and BC. Decides against Georgetown due to its EA policy. Decides BC is too much of a reach, so decides on Villanova for ED1. They love Villanova and, while they *like* Fordham and Providence, far prefer Villanova.
If deferred by Villanova in ED1, would you tell them to apply to Fordham ED2? Or roll the dice on BC as an ED2 pick and keep their Villanova dream alive?
This is the scenario we may find ourselves in (although, none of these five schools.) I am trying to help manage my kid's expectations -- for example, by finding more "target" schools.
I see the logic here. You are applying to BC ED2 just for the heck of it because you don’t want to foreclose the possibility of getting into Villanova RD (unless you got lucky and got into BC).
I think you would need to have a realistic probability in mind as far as getting into Villanova having been deferred as well as the risk of not getting into Fordham or Providence RD and ending up somewhere even worse.
In my DC’s case we were worried DC would end up with some not so great options if it came down to RD (because we went 0 for 2 swinging for the fences in ED) so we aimed a little lower ED2 and it worked, no regrets.
You understand meThat's what I'm worried about -- getting to RD with some not-so-great options. I guess I need to make my kid be not so in love with their ED1 pick.
Do schools typically provide the percentage of students who are deferred ED and then accepted RD? I wonder if those rates are approximately the same as the RD acceptance rate, or better (since they know the child is likely to accept their offer, since they initially applied ED1.)
I’m not sure but it seems that if your kid didn’t make the cut ED1, why would the school change its mind? It’s kind of like getting off the waitlist. Possible but do you really want to count on it? I think after the ED1 school defers or rejects your kid, it becomes pretty easy to fall out of love with that school. It’s also important to be really honest with yourself how strong the applicant is. If you’ve got some identifiable weaknesses, you probably want to play it a bit safer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK let's do this with some hypotheticals. Suppose your child wants to attend a mid-sized college on the east coast with a business school. (I'm using all Catholic examples here to make it more apples:apples.) Your choices are (in order of difficulty of admission) Georgetown, BC, Villanova, Fordham, Providence. Let's say GU and BC are reaches, Villanova is a match, and Fordham and Providence are likelies.
Student decides their top choices are Georgetown and BC. Decides against Georgetown due to its EA policy. Decides BC is too much of a reach, so decides on Villanova for ED1. They love Villanova and, while they *like* Fordham and Providence, far prefer Villanova.
If deferred by Villanova in ED1, would you tell them to apply to Fordham ED2? Or roll the dice on BC as an ED2 pick and keep their Villanova dream alive?
This is the scenario we may find ourselves in (although, none of these five schools.) I am trying to help manage my kid's expectations -- for example, by finding more "target" schools.
I see the logic here. You are applying to BC ED2 just for the heck of it because you don’t want to foreclose the possibility of getting into Villanova RD (unless you got lucky and got into BC).
I think you would need to have a realistic probability in mind as far as getting into Villanova having been deferred as well as the risk of not getting into Fordham or Providence RD and ending up somewhere even worse.
In my DC’s case we were worried DC would end up with some not so great options if it came down to RD (because we went 0 for 2 swinging for the fences in ED) so we aimed a little lower ED2 and it worked, no regrets.
You understand meThat's what I'm worried about -- getting to RD with some not-so-great options. I guess I need to make my kid be not so in love with their ED1 pick.
Do schools typically provide the percentage of students who are deferred ED and then accepted RD? I wonder if those rates are approximately the same as the RD acceptance rate, or better (since they know the child is likely to accept their offer, since they initially applied ED1.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK let's do this with some hypotheticals. Suppose your child wants to attend a mid-sized college on the east coast with a business school. (I'm using all Catholic examples here to make it more apples:apples.) Your choices are (in order of difficulty of admission) Georgetown, BC, Villanova, Fordham, Providence. Let's say GU and BC are reaches, Villanova is a match, and Fordham and Providence are likelies.
Student decides their top choices are Georgetown and BC. Decides against Georgetown due to its EA policy. Decides BC is too much of a reach, so decides on Villanova for ED1. They love Villanova and, while they *like* Fordham and Providence, far prefer Villanova.
If deferred by Villanova in ED1, would you tell them to apply to Fordham ED2? Or roll the dice on BC as an ED2 pick and keep their Villanova dream alive?
This is the scenario we may find ourselves in (although, none of these five schools.) I am trying to help manage my kid's expectations -- for example, by finding more "target" schools.
I see the logic here. You are applying to BC ED2 just for the heck of it because you don’t want to foreclose the possibility of getting into Villanova RD (unless you got lucky and got into BC).
I think you would need to have a realistic probability in mind as far as getting into Villanova having been deferred as well as the risk of not getting into Fordham or Providence RD and ending up somewhere even worse.
In my DC’s case we were worried DC would end up with some not so great options if it came down to RD (because we went 0 for 2 swinging for the fences in ED) so we aimed a little lower ED2 and it worked, no regrets.
That's what I'm worried about -- getting to RD with some not-so-great options. I guess I need to make my kid be not so in love with their ED1 pick.
Anonymous wrote:OK let's do this with some hypotheticals. Suppose your child wants to attend a mid-sized college on the east coast with a business school. (I'm using all Catholic examples here to make it more apples:apples.) Your choices are (in order of difficulty of admission) Georgetown, BC, Villanova, Fordham, Providence. Let's say GU and BC are reaches, Villanova is a match, and Fordham and Providence are likelies.
Student decides their top choices are Georgetown and BC. Decides against Georgetown due to its EA policy. Decides BC is too much of a reach, so decides on Villanova for ED1. They love Villanova and, while they *like* Fordham and Providence, far prefer Villanova.
If deferred by Villanova in ED1, would you tell them to apply to Fordham ED2? Or roll the dice on BC as an ED2 pick and keep their Villanova dream alive?
This is the scenario we may find ourselves in (although, none of these five schools.) I am trying to help manage my kid's expectations -- for example, by finding more "target" schools.
Anonymous wrote:mine applied ed1 to slam. lottery for anyone. get deferred. ED2 to one notch down accepted.
Anonymous wrote:mine applied ed1 to slam. lottery for anyone. get deferred. ED2 to one notch down accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in ED1, but it could have gone the other way and we didn't have any kind of ED2 plan. We were going to take a psycho road trip to see as many schools as possible over the holiday break (prior visit opportunities were constrained by Covid.) I was pushing for a more competitive school for ED2, which I now know would have been nuts.
Whatever you do, don't leave it until you hear from the ED1; definitely push your kid to pick an alternative, if only to avoid getting too fixated on one school.
Why were you thinking going more competitive for ED2? What was the rationale?
Agree about ED1, then ED2 (or not strategy). One DC had an ED1, ED2 strategy with the second option at more of a high target while the ED1 was at a low to medium reach, which CCO thought was a high probability of admit. Second DC had an ED1 strategy, but would not agree on an ED2, which was interesting as this DC is usually more organized and gaming risks than the other one. This DC also probably a little more self assured as their CCO was saying they would be fine with applications to 30% admits and below. Fortunately both DCs got in ED1. I can't imagine what would have happened if the second DC would have ended up with WLs/rejects due to the CCO's possibly bad advice.