Anonymous wrote:Current job: great gig at DOJ, true 40 hour weeks (rarely ever nights/weekends), but full-time in-person requirement, which means I'm gone 10+ hours everyday.
Job offer: $75k more in base salary (although health insurance will be much more expensive), 1560 billable target ("part-time" BigLaw), mostly remote, great flexibility other than the unpredictable swings of litigation (so definitely a give and take with the flexibility), the group partner has been vetted as a great guy to work for.
Which would you do? #1 priority is maximizing time with kids.
Anonymous wrote:At the law firm, you should be aware of the fact that you have no job security. You are vulnerable to a downturn in the economy, a decision to start outsourcing your work, or a decision that you must either go for partner or get out. Do not expect a part time litigation support gig to last. What's your plan for your next gig?
Anonymous wrote:You need to find an attorney job in a different agency with a different in-office requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no such thing as part time in litigation. They may be telling you you’ll be part time at 1500-1600 hrs but let’s be real when a TRO lands on your desk or an expedited discovery schedule requiring your team to get dozens of depos done all over the country in a month or some ridiculous emergency brief needs to be out the door in 2 days - do you genuinely believe you can peace out bc you’re part time? And hold onto your job come the next review cycle (bc I’m assuming you’re going in as an associate or counsel not an equity partner w a book that’d provide you job security). I wouldn’t do it. I say this as someone who did it and loved it - but time with kids wasn’t an issue for me back then.
+1 I wouldn’t do this unless I was at least doubling my comp. Not worth it.
Anonymous wrote:Where in DOJ has a full-time in person requirement? Rhetorical, not expecting an answer, but I know a lot of people in different divisions and the most I’ve heard of is 3 days a week.
Anonymous wrote:There is no such thing as part time in litigation. They may be telling you you’ll be part time at 1500-1600 hrs but let’s be real when a TRO lands on your desk or an expedited discovery schedule requiring your team to get dozens of depos done all over the country in a month or some ridiculous emergency brief needs to be out the door in 2 days - do you genuinely believe you can peace out bc you’re part time? And hold onto your job come the next review cycle (bc I’m assuming you’re going in as an associate or counsel not an equity partner w a book that’d provide you job security). I wouldn’t do it. I say this as someone who did it and loved it - but time with kids wasn’t an issue for me back then.
Anonymous wrote:I’d be surprised if you didn’t regret leaving government. There is no private that gives you more time with your kids than government. And, if you haven’t been a litigator before, it’s always unpredictable and screws with your personal life. And there is never flexibility when you’re a trial lawyer. You will be expected to be there regular business hours, work more than 40 hours a week and be accessible to clients after hours. There’s a reason that people jump to government.
I loved law firm work but within six months of my first kid, I knew I had to leave if I wanted time with my kid and I jumped to government for that true 40’hour a week job.
Anonymous wrote:Current job: great gig at DOJ, true 40 hour weeks (rarely ever nights/weekends), but full-time in-person requirement, which means I'm gone 10+ hours everyday.
Job offer: $75k more in base salary (although health insurance will be much more expensive), 1560 billable target ("part-time" BigLaw), mostly remote, great flexibility other than the unpredictable swings of litigation (so definitely a give and take with the flexibility), the group partner has been vetted as a great guy to work for.
Which would you do? #1 priority is maximizing time with kids.
Anonymous wrote:Better pay, access to mentorship and more aggressive cases. You will learn a lot in big law which you can transfer back to govt.
Anonymous wrote:maybe you can switch to HR role, then it's likely easy to move between agencies
Anonymous wrote:Better pay, access to mentorship and more aggressive cases. You will learn a lot in big law which you can transfer back to govt.