Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do not want to go to Chicago pre-med. Go to a slightly less rigorous school with easier grading..so med school application looks great. Do consult on this point with med school students.
Her medical school will likely be ruined if going to UChicago. GPA is the king for medical schools.
Anonymous wrote:We understand we are one of the lucky ones that have won the admission lottery so no flame please. DC is interested in STEM and in with significant merit at Case. For the other two we will have to be full pay. There is not much different between Cornell and Case for the programs (bio, medicine) DC is interested in and off course UChicago has the cache. Us parents feel she will not miss anything if she goes to Case and it will give her the flexibility to do a lot more which the other two wont and in the process save a ton of money for the future. DC is leaning UChicago, we think mostly because of the ranking. We can do full pay at the other two but rather not. WWYD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U Chicago has two goals- give students the ability to think in the context of a broad liberal arts education for the first two years. Then specialize for the second two years and help students achieve outcomes (professions, higher Ed). They are very explicit and purposeful, and with my DCs there I think it’s the best of both worlds. One of the things the students love is they don’t push memorization of content on you, but ask you to think creatively- so in a recent STEM class the professor told the students not to answer if they already knew the answer- instead he wanted kids who did not know the answer to talk about how they would approach the problem and to hypothesize.
As a side note, my DC is getting asked to interview for internships at top firms even with a GPA lower that 3.7- people know Chicago curves to a B- average.
Check out their ROI to see how well their goals work out in real life. If they are so good, so expensive, why are they so mediocre?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U Chicago has two goals- give students the ability to think in the context of a broad liberal arts education for the first two years. Then specialize for the second two years and help students achieve outcomes (professions, higher Ed). They are very explicit and purposeful, and with my DCs there I think it’s the best of both worlds. One of the things the students love is they don’t push memorization of content on you, but ask you to think creatively- so in a recent STEM class the professor told the students not to answer if they already knew the answer- instead he wanted kids who did not know the answer to talk about how they would approach the problem and to hypothesize.
As a side note, my DC is getting asked to interview for internships at top firms even with a GPA lower that 3.7- people know Chicago curves to a B- average.
This sounds so cool! How lucky your kid is there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pre-med acceptance rates to medical school
Case - 64% https://case.edu/admission/academics/areas-study/pre-med
Chicago - between 79% and 88% https://admissionsight.com/pre-med-at-uchicago/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20students%20of%20pre,of%20the%20previous%20few%20years.
Cornell - says they're 20-25% above national average (43%) https://scl.cornell.edu/sites/scl/files/documents/2020-21%20First-Year%20Pre-Med%20Guide-VD.pdf
UChicago and Swarthmore are notorious for gaming the system. I don't know about Chicago but Swarthmore keeps its acceptance rate high by being one of the best gatekeepers to the med schools by refusing to write recommendations for weak students. They screen their own with an eye towards likely acceptances. This is how some schools can claim a high rate of success.
. Anonymous wrote:U Chicago has two goals- give students the ability to think in the context of a broad liberal arts education for the first two years. Then specialize for the second two years and help students achieve outcomes (professions, higher Ed). They are very explicit and purposeful, and with my DCs there I think it’s the best of both worlds. One of the things the students love is they don’t push memorization of content on you, but ask you to think creatively- so in a recent STEM class the professor told the students not to answer if they already knew the answer- instead he wanted kids who did not know the answer to talk about how they would approach the problem and to hypothesize.
As a side note, my DC is getting asked to interview for internships at top firms even with a GPA lower that 3.7- people know Chicago curves to a B- average.
Anonymous wrote:No idea- I do think there is tension between wanting to deliver a liberal arts education that is recognized as among the best everywhere, and the need to get a job and get into a profession. I know 99% are placed after college into programs and jobs.
But I agree if the goal or only metric is just to maximize preprofessiinal outcome or ROI, go to Wharton or NYU and grab the $$$
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pre-med acceptance rates to medical school
Case - 64% https://case.edu/admission/academics/areas-study/pre-med
Chicago - between 79% and 88% https://admissionsight.com/pre-med-at-uchicago/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20students%20of%20pre,of%20the%20previous%20few%20years.
Cornell - says they're 20-25% above national average (43%) https://scl.cornell.edu/sites/scl/files/documents/2020-21%20First-Year%20Pre-Med%20Guide-VD.pdf
If so many UChicago students become above-average income MDs, why is their ROI so low? Something's not adding up.
Anonymous wrote:Pre-med acceptance rates to medical school
Case - 64% https://case.edu/admission/academics/areas-study/pre-med
Chicago - between 79% and 88% https://admissionsight.com/pre-med-at-uchicago/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20students%20of%20pre,of%20the%20previous%20few%20years.
Cornell - says they're 20-25% above national average (43%) https://scl.cornell.edu/sites/scl/files/documents/2020-21%20First-Year%20Pre-Med%20Guide-VD.pdf
Anonymous wrote:U Chicago has two goals- give students the ability to think in the context of a broad liberal arts education for the first two years. Then specialize for the second two years and help students achieve outcomes (professions, higher Ed). They are very explicit and purposeful, and with my DCs there I think it’s the best of both worlds. One of the things the students love is they don’t push memorization of content on you, but ask you to think creatively- so in a recent STEM class the professor told the students not to answer if they already knew the answer- instead he wanted kids who did not know the answer to talk about how they would approach the problem and to hypothesize.
As a side note, my DC is getting asked to interview for internships at top firms even with a GPA lower that 3.7- people know Chicago curves to a B- average.