Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Any hole in the road that is made for work should have something identifying to drivers. Don’t be obtuse.
Yea, these usually have metal plates over them or are coned off. Even if Arnold knew it was originally used for work, when they seemingly finished the work and then didn’t fill it for weeks, what was he supposed to think?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That what happens when you elect an ambitious actor, and not a very good one, to public office. They feel entitled to do things their way. I hope he pays for the labor and materials to undo his good deed.
Uhh, you do know he was governor quite some time ago, right? And that he was generally well regarded for the job he did?
(Or does that interfere with your narrative?)
Anonymous wrote:That what happens when you elect an ambitious actor, and not a very good one, to public office. They feel entitled to do things their way. I hope he pays for the labor and materials to undo his good deed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Any hole in the road that is made for work should have something identifying to drivers. Don’t be obtuse.
Yea, these usually have metal plates over them or are coned off. Even if Arnold knew it was originally used for work, when they seemingly finished the work and then didn’t fill it for weeks, what was he supposed to think?