Anonymous wrote:The rest of the country needs to send SF money for taking the entire country’s homeless populations.
Those vagrants weren’t born in CA. SF needs to start shipping them back to the heartland or wherever they come from.

Anonymous wrote:Still sad that people would rather live in a liberal hellhole than where ever you live, OP? Housing prices don’t lie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

It’s really simple,

San Fran and Cali have some of the highest taxes in the country already. You raise taxes or tax “billionaires” more and they simply just move to Texas, Colorado. Even companies like Tesla have moved headquarters as well as dozens of others.



Gotta get over the notion that more taxing fixes problems. It’s how you spend the money that matters. If you waste the money or start promising billions of freebees like free medical and college for illegals, wasteful projects, so many other promises the state has made that can’t back up financially, Thai is what u get.

Anonymous wrote:How much of San Francisco’s housing problem was caused by unregulated foreign money in real estate. We need to stop selling our country to other countries and non-citizens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

Its unsafe. They need to do something about safety to clean it up so businesses can still do business there and people can live in the homes.

They HAVE done something: they defunded the SF police, like everyone should. Because of racism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

Its unsafe. They need to do something about safety to clean it up so businesses can still do business there and people can live in the homes.

They HAVE done something: they defunded the SF police, like everyone should. Because of racism.

Yeah, let’s get rid of the police all together!!!!! Then let’s see what happens to crime!!!!! Do it San Fran.

WASHINGTON, April 5 (Reuters) - Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on his fellow Republicans in Congress to slash funding for the U.S. Justice Department and the FBI, one day after pleading not guilty in New York to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

Its unsafe. They need to do something about safety to clean it up so businesses can still do business there and people can live in the homes.

They HAVE done something: they defunded the SF police, like everyone should. Because of racism.

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has NOTHING to do with liberal politics ffs. This is about not sufficiently taxing California's many billionaires, and not using that extra tax money for all the resources necessary to prevent vulnerable people from falling through the cracks.

"Liberal" is a cloak for greed in California, not an actual lived ideal. It's hypocrisy and abandonment of the vulnerable where it really counts.

Its unsafe. They need to do something about safety to clean it up so businesses can still do business there and people can live in the homes.

Anonymous wrote:Whole Foods in downtown has decided to close because of crime and vagrancy, and because the company can no longer guarantee the safety of its workers:

https://sfstandard.com/business/downtown-san-francisco-whole-foods-market-closing/

Starbucks has had to remove seats now because the homeless invading its stores:


https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/sf-castro-starbucks-seating-removed-17854447.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight

WFH is adding another whammy to the city, which is now expected to be in trouble with an $800M budget deficits:


https://sfstandard.com/politics/city-hall/san-franciscos-deficit-swells-to-780m-in-latest-sign-of-budget-distress/

Really said to see how SF style leadership has destroyed a once beautiful city that is falling into the pits of lawlessness and financial disaster. Mind-blowing how they can keep re-election the same over and over and over again when the results keep getting worse and worse and now and businesses are closing up shop and are fleeing. Why do so many other cities and voters continue to vote for politicians trying to run on a similar model like SF's politicians? It is scary how fast SF has declined.