Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the last admissions round, I would say it’s an advantage at all elite schools except for state flagships in states with public school guarantees.
I'd take it a step further and suggest that private school students have the most success with SLACS, followed by USNWR National privates, then state flagships.
I mostly agree but will say private school students seem to place better at OOS state flagships - UVA, Michigan, UCLA, Cal, etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the last admissions round, I would say it’s an advantage at all elite schools except for state flagships in states with public school guarantees.
I'd take it a step further and suggest that private school students have the most success with SLACS, followed by USNWR National privates, then state flagships.
Anonymous wrote:I think so. Going to a top prep school or even a top public magnet school is a disadvantage now.
Anonymous wrote:Our public school college and career admissions counselor has lectured parents several times about “equity” and how college admissions committees are trained to screen out students who had “pay to play” opportunities. She gave the example of high test scores due to tutoring, a non-profit, international service trips and expensive enrichment opportunities.
But here’s the thing. What I spend on my child to prep for the SAT is a tiny tiny fraction of what some parents spend for a private high school.
Curious as to others thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:Based on the last admissions round, I would say it’s an advantage at all elite schools except for state flagships in states with public school guarantees.
Anonymous wrote:If the school is private, students will be expected to have higher test scores, more impressive ECs etc.
Anonymous wrote:I think colleges nit pick the service trips, but can’t allow themselves to see that the same principle extends to private high schools, because elite colleges themselves are pay-to-play private schools too.
Anonymous wrote:I am sure the trip sand pay-to-play enrichment are a red flag. Disagree that a high SAT score should be a flag.
That said, I think my high-stats kid was waitlist at some target schools that they might have got in test-optional.