Anonymous wrote:
But to get rid of guns all together isn’t going to happen.
Besides the 2nd amendment which other amendment are you ok with getting rid of?
Because that’s really the heart of the issue.
Neither political party is willing to alter an amendment bc once you start then it it’s a slippery slope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gov Beshear (a democrat) said he has a good friend who is one of the victims.
Sadly, I fear that will make the Rs in KY even more resolute to not let this change anything.
+1
But it doesn’t matter. Governor Lee’s wife had a friend who was killed in the Nashville shooting. Rep. Scalise almost died. They still don’t care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gov Beshear (a democrat) said he has a good friend who is one of the victims.
Sadly, I fear that will make the Rs in KY even more resolute to not let this change anything.
+1
But it doesn’t matter. Governor Lee’s wife had a friend who was killed in the Nashville shooting. Rep. Scalise almost died. They still don’t care.
Anonymous wrote:Gov Beshear (a democrat) said he has a good friend who is one of the victims.
Sadly, I fear that will make the Rs in KY even more resolute to not let this change anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reports of five dead and six injured by a shooter at a bank in Louisville. Maybe red states will start to change their view if more shootings happen in their states? Thoughts and prayers aren’t working, so it’s long past time to try something else.
I’m sorry for the victims and families (unless they’re anti gun control in which case you get what you get.)
How much worse will it get before it gets better? Columbine should have been enough, and definitely Sandy Hook. Maybe it’s time to start posting pictures of the carnage so people will start to understand the damage guns do, especially assault rifles. Nothing else is working.
Red states already have higher rates of gun violence and death: accident, homicide, and suicide. It doesn't matter, for several reasons: feelings about the second amendment, thinking they won't be affected (especially since blue cities in red states have a lot of the homicides and rural white voters distance themselves from that), huge campaign contributions from groups that oppose even very popular and minor changes to gun laws
That is a lot of statements with no support.
And yet, the death rates from firearms in red states are higher (do you dispute that?) and they are not passing laws to change that...if anything, going to more open carry.and easier permits for young adults or no permits required at all. To what do you attribute that?
I question everything when not supported.
California has had 25 mass shooting since 1982 - the most of any state. Last I checked it was not a red state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reports of five dead and six injured by a shooter at a bank in Louisville. Maybe red states will start to change their view if more shootings happen in their states? Thoughts and prayers aren’t working, so it’s long past time to try something else.
I’m sorry for the victims and families (unless they’re anti gun control in which case you get what you get.)
How much worse will it get before it gets better? Columbine should have been enough, and definitely Sandy Hook. Maybe it’s time to start posting pictures of the carnage so people will start to understand the damage guns do, especially assault rifles. Nothing else is working.
Red states already have higher rates of gun violence and death: accident, homicide, and suicide. It doesn't matter, for several reasons: feelings about the second amendment, thinking they won't be affected (especially since blue cities in red states have a lot of the homicides and rural white voters distance themselves from that), huge campaign contributions from groups that oppose even very popular and minor changes to gun laws
That is a lot of statements with no support.
And yet, the death rates from firearms in red states are higher (do you dispute that?) and they are not passing laws to change that...if anything, going to more open carry.and easier permits for young adults or no permits required at all. To what do you attribute that?
Anonymous wrote:
The Blue States are to blame too, since no lefty politician has come out with a GUN BAN. Everyone is to blame.
We need a gun ban, with possible exceptions for hunting weapons, to pacify the hunting crowd. Mass shooters usually buy their guns ad hoc, so it's not like this country awash in guns should just despair. If people are not allowed to buy guns anymore, there will be way, way, fewer shootings.
We also need a gun buyback program. Don't tell me DoD has a 842 BILLION budget but the feds don't have enough money to buy guns back from people. This is a matter of national security. Many more people die from domestic gun violence than US soldiers die abroad.
Bonus: if the police knows there's less likelihood a gun is present at a stop, they won't be so trigger happy when they see someone rifling through their bag or glove box.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently a former employee of the bank.
Circumstances don’t matter, though, nothing will change.
Thanks, my initial guess had been a robbery.
The thing about these shootings is that they're all based on emotional and psychological issues.
and all involve guns
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently a former employee of the bank.
Circumstances don’t matter, though, nothing will change.
Thanks, my initial guess had been a robbery.
The thing about these shootings is that they're all based on emotional and psychological issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently a former employee of the bank.
Circumstances don’t matter, though, nothing will change.
Thanks, my initial guess had been a robbery.