Anonymous wrote:Princeton students have many different experiences with eating clubs and the clubs have a wide range of personalities and vibes. As an alum who did get caught up in wanting to be in a selective club in the 90s and who was not successful with bicker, I can tell you it was an awful experience that cast a shadow over my time there. I wish I had had enough maturity to reject the bicker process and just do a lottery club, but I didn’t at the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The impact of the clubs on social life cannot be understated. There is much that is negative about it. On the other hand, without the clubs, the school has no culture
Another thing to consider is that they don't join until 2nd semester sophomore year, the uncertainty of which club you can join and whether you'll get a spot at the club you'd like. DC had a friend that didn't get into an eating club he hoped to join with friends and that negatively affected his junior & senior years. There seemed to be a lot riding on it in terms of one's community and social life.
Anonymous wrote:The impact of the clubs on social life cannot be understated. There is much that is negative about it. On the other hand, without the clubs, the school has no culture
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The impact of the clubs on social life cannot be understated. There is much that is negative about it. On the other hand, without the clubs, the school has no culture
That’s not really true. The university has its own distinct culture and the residential colleges provide a sense of community for the first two years. But less so than would be the case if kids weren’t already figuring out by sophomore year how they are going to self-segregate by junior year.
It’s a big enough place and the kids who get in are talented enough that almost everyone finds their niche and ends up having a good experience. But the eating clubs that require kids to Bicker are antiquated relics.
No one is turning down Princeton because of the eating clubs. There may be legitimate complaints about them, but that isn’t one.
Anonymous wrote:The impact of the clubs on social life cannot be understated. There is much that is negative about it. On the other hand, without the clubs, the school has no culture
Anonymous wrote:No one is turning down Princeton because of the eating clubs. There may be legitimate complaints about them, but that isn’t one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they snobfests or just basically dining halls?
what do you think? snobfests, all the way.
Not really. About half are open to any students who sign up to eat there and some still have a system that’s equivalent to a fraternity/sorority rush. I’m surprised Eisgruber hasn’t put an end to those clubs but I guess they’re important to some alumni.
They are important to many alumni who have very fond memories of their times at eating clubs, in large part because many bear almost no resemblance to the snobfest OP and others seem to envision. And as for the few clubs that do somewhat match those images, they are very easy to avoid them if that’s your seen.
I have fond memories of Princeton, but the Bicker clubs stood out as places where I felt unseen and unwelcome, as a student from a middle-class background lacking the social connections or capital of classmates from fancier backgrounds. Every year a significant number of undergraduates call on the administration to put an end to Bicker as antithetical to the school’s commitment to diversity, and every year Eisgruber comes up with some reason to do nothing. I guess they can ignore how the reputation of the eating clubs discourages a lot of top kids from even applying to Princeton as long as they’re only admitting 5-6% of applicants, but it likely contributes to the significantly lower volume of applications Princeton receives compared to some of its peer schools.
I don’t agree with painting all bicker clubs with the same brush and, while some alumni would like the university to get rid of bicker (doing so wouldn’t be that easy), I don’t think anywhere near the majority think the university should do that.
If you don’t like the social scene at Ivy or Cottage, don’t go to Ivy and Cottage. I certainly didn’t.
It’s less that Princeton students can avoid Ivy and Cottage if they do choose than that many of the best applicants in the country will avoid Princeton entirely because the reputation for social exclusivity persists. I knew early on I had no interest in Bicker, but I still remember how crushed one of the Jewish kids in our dorm (a tall, gregarious athlete) was when Cottage turned him away, for reasons no one ever knew.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they snobfests or just basically dining halls?
what do you think? snobfests, all the way.
Not really. About half are open to any students who sign up to eat there and some still have a system that’s equivalent to a fraternity/sorority rush. I’m surprised Eisgruber hasn’t put an end to those clubs but I guess they’re important to some alumni.
They are important to many alumni who have very fond memories of their times at eating clubs, in large part because many bear almost no resemblance to the snobfest OP and others seem to envision. And as for the few clubs that do somewhat match those images, they are very easy to avoid them if that’s your seen.
I have fond memories of Princeton, but the Bicker clubs stood out as places where I felt unseen and unwelcome, as a student from a middle-class background lacking the social connections or capital of classmates from fancier backgrounds. Every year a significant number of undergraduates call on the administration to put an end to Bicker as antithetical to the school’s commitment to diversity, and every year Eisgruber comes up with some reason to do nothing. I guess they can ignore how the reputation of the eating clubs discourages a lot of top kids from even applying to Princeton as long as they’re only admitting 5-6% of applicants, but it likely contributes to the significantly lower volume of applications Princeton receives compared to some of its peer schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they snobfests or just basically dining halls?
what do you think? snobfests, all the way.
Not really. About half are open to any students who sign up to eat there and some still have a system that’s equivalent to a fraternity/sorority rush. I’m surprised Eisgruber hasn’t put an end to those clubs but I guess they’re important to some alumni.
They are important to many alumni who have very fond memories of their times at eating clubs, in large part because many bear almost no resemblance to the snobfest OP and others seem to envision. And as for the few clubs that do somewhat match those images, they are very easy to avoid them if that’s your seen.
I have fond memories of Princeton, but the Bicker clubs stood out as places where I felt unseen and unwelcome, as a student from a middle-class background lacking the social connections or capital of classmates from fancier backgrounds. Every year a significant number of undergraduates call on the administration to put an end to Bicker as antithetical to the school’s commitment to diversity, and every year Eisgruber comes up with some reason to do nothing. I guess they can ignore how the reputation of the eating clubs discourages a lot of top kids from even applying to Princeton as long as they’re only admitting 5-6% of applicants, but it likely contributes to the significantly lower volume of applications Princeton receives compared to some of its peer schools.
I don’t agree with painting all bicker clubs with the same brush and, while some alumni would like the university to get rid of bicker (doing so wouldn’t be that easy), I don’t think anywhere near the majority think the university should do that.
If you don’t like the social scene at Ivy or Cottage, don’t go to Ivy and Cottage. I certainly didn’t.