Anonymous wrote:Our CEO is in her early 50s. She’s very attractive and always impeccably dressed and made up. I am sure she works with a consultant to help her and schedules regular beauty appointments. Must be exhausting
Anonymous wrote:Definitely not true for my Fortune 500 company. The top women are the go getters, pulling in 100 hour workweeks easily. They actually dress rather dowdy and they are definitely not in their 30s, more 50s. I think they are beautiful, but definitely not sexified...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They blew their way to the top, not surprising.
Disgusting. Nice way to set back the women's movement by decades.
Anonymous wrote:Who are director or above in more male dominated areas. Not to steal the topic from the other thread, but I noticed that of the women who have made it to higher levels in our company in more male dominated departments, I.e excluding hr and marketing, they are all attractive women in their 30s. One is C level, others are director, senior director and a VP in various areas in tech, engineering and strategy. Their bosses are all men, who were the ones who promoted all these women into their positions.
So my question is is this a coincidence at my company or are attractive and competent women more likely to get promoted by men in male dominated professions than average or less than average and competent women? Do the men realize this or is it subconscious?
I’m also noticing that the same can’t be said about the male leadership in the same areas. While yes they are all groomed and dress nicely, they are not attractive in the same way the women are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our CEO is in her early 50s. She’s very attractive and always impeccably dressed and made up. I am sure she works with a consultant to help her and schedules regular beauty appointments. Must be exhausting
One of my previous boss is in her 50s, her face actually looks identical to when she was 37. The only thing changed was her hair color faded.
Anonymous wrote:Our CEO is in her early 50s. She’s very attractive and always impeccably dressed and made up. I am sure she works with a consultant to help her and schedules regular beauty appointments. Must be exhausting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely not true for my Fortune 500 company. The top women are the go getters, pulling in 100 hour workweeks easily. They actually dress rather dowdy and they are definitely not in their 30s, more 50s. I think they are beautiful, but definitely not sexified...
Same here. They aren't even traditionally beautiful. They work their butts off and have put up with a lot of nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are director or above in more male dominated areas. Not to steal the topic from the other thread, but I noticed that of the women who have made it to higher levels in our company in more male dominated departments, I.e excluding hr and marketing, they are all attractive women in their 30s. One is C level, others are director, senior director and a VP in various areas in tech, engineering and strategy. Their bosses are all men, who were the ones who promoted all these women into their positions.
So my question is is this a coincidence at my company or are attractive and competent women more likely to get promoted by men in male dominated professions than average or less than average and competent women? Do the men realize this or is it subconscious?
I’m also noticing that the same can’t be said about the male leadership in the same areas. While yes they are all groomed and dress nicely, they are not attractive in the same way the women are.
Duh.
Anonymous wrote:At a certain level everyone has the baseline skills and what differentiates people are their people skills, their confidence, and imo most importantly their ability to see the field and position themselves accordingly.