Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
I am no apologist for TR or the departed ED. She was a disaster. Sadly her departure was not related to TR's trajectory. The incompetent, lazy, disconnected Board would have kept her. She left because of a family matter. The schools is actually much better off with her gone. That one is a check in the "win" category.
lol that’s a very benign way of describing why she left.
I didn’t like her either but don’t think the next one is likely to be any better. Problems run deep at two rivers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
I am no apologist for TR or the departed ED. She was a disaster. Sadly her departure was not related to TR's trajectory. The incompetent, lazy, disconnected Board would have kept her. She left because of a family matter. The schools is actually much better off with her gone. That one is a check in the "win" category.
lol that’s a very benign way of describing why she left.
I didn’t like her either but don’t think the next one is likely to be any better. Problems run deep at two rivers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
I am no apologist for TR or the departed ED. She was a disaster. Sadly her departure was not related to TR's trajectory. The incompetent, lazy, disconnected Board would have kept her. She left because of a family matter. The schools is actually much better off with her gone. That one is a check in the "win" category.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
The Browne ECE hallway is sad but the school is reasonably well run and small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.
Anonymous wrote:Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They’re both fairly even, IMO. Leadership is not good at both schools.
But Ludlow Taylor has leadership in place, correct? TRY doesn’t even really have that this point.
Yes. LT has a principal who will be in her 3rd year next year. She's basically fine, just not super involved. Because the teacher leadership is so strong and the PTO/parents so involved (check out the thread complaining about how the school has too many community events), the school basically just runs without the principal when she doesn't want to be involved. It's a very different situation than TRY is in.
Can you link that thread?