Anonymous wrote:I love the guy. If elected, he will end affirmative action by EO on day one.
So many other reasons to like his vision!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.
I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.
I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.
Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.
Not really a supporter, I just know that he's a very bright guy and not Marianne Williamson. Does that make him a good politician? Remains to be seen, but he can definitely work on his craft. Mitt Romney is bright, but has difficulty connecting with people. It happens.
As far as AA and ESG, he is fighting an uphill battle to get on the debate stages. He needs attention and visibility, ASAP. Party apparatuses and debate networks are not exactly favorable to outsider candidates. The more I see his name, the more it looks like that strategy is at least yielding some positive dividends for the stage of his campaign.
In other words he is race-baiting to get the big white grievance donor money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.
I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.
I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.
Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.
Not really a supporter, I just know that he's a very bright guy and not Marianne Williamson. Does that make him a good politician? Remains to be seen, but he can definitely work on his craft. Mitt Romney is bright, but has difficulty connecting with people. It happens.
As far as AA and ESG, he is fighting an uphill battle to get on the debate stages. He needs attention and visibility, ASAP. Party apparatuses and debate networks are not exactly favorable to outsider candidates. The more I see his name, the more it looks like that strategy is at least yielding some positive dividends for the stage of his campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.
I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.
I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.
Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.
I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.
I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.
I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.
I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He won’t last campaigning in Iowa
He’s vegetarian
Dude will need to have a chef travel with him or he’s gonna get sick due to nutritional deficiency
He also has an odd voice if u know what I mean
You're right. No vegetarians live in Iowa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?
Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.
Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.
I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.
Anonymous wrote:He’s an immigrant of color. The GOP doesn’t want him.