Anonymous wrote:The scoring was also recalibrated a few decades ago…basically, the “center” of the distribution was shifted to the right about 100 points.
So a score of 1500 now is closer to a score of 1400 in 1990.
Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Anonymous wrote:DD got 1 question wrong and got a 1590. Her classmate got 1 question wrong the next testing session and it was a 1580. I guess it depends on other kids scores.
Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Maybe, but if you can miss 2-4 questions and get a 1600, that was not possible 'back in the day.'
Two wrong on each section might have scored as low as 1500.
No more penalty for guessing either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Maybe, but if you can miss 2-4 questions and get a 1600, that was not possible 'back in the day.'
Two wrong on each section might have scored as low as 1500.
Nonsense.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
+100 these kids would have run circles around us
I think there is debate as to whether the SAT is easier since they removed vocabulary questions and analogy questions. Back in the day, you had to know what a word meant from memory vs. deducing its meaning by including the word in a sentence.
Also, there was a movement to transition it from being more of an "IQ" type test to testing kids on what they should learn at school.
Not sure if the Math section has been changed all the much over the years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not easier. Students are working harder.
Maybe, but if you can miss 2-4 questions and get a 1600, that was not possible 'back in the day.'
Two wrong on each section might have scored as low as 1500.