Anonymous wrote:Start a Christmas tree farm!
Anonymous wrote:Find a local land trust, I recommend the Land Trust Alliance as a good source, FWIW, I work for an organization that does easements. There needs to be some ecological value to the land and it needs to be adjacent to other undeveloped land to be considered. You wouldn’t believe the number of calls we get from people in places like Arlington or Bethesda who want us to put their half acre in a suburban development under easement and we have to tell them it’s a nice thought, but no dice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
And a nimby
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
+1 Once OP is dead, no one else will care about this. It's stupid and selfish to try to control everything after you're dead. There's an affordable housing crisis but OP believes that future generations should pay homage to the (now unusable) land of her ancestors. Let the living use it how it best suits their needs.
OP clearly stated they don’t want the lane to be developed, and to preserve loudouns rural roots. Affordable housing should be strictly built in urban, residential existing areas, and keep the agricultural parts that way.
Most of the land we all live on now was once agricultural. What a ridiculous idea that it should stay that way in perpetuity just because OP doesn't like change.
OP doesn’t mention they don’t want change, but rather they don’t want it developed. Loudoun produces the most vineyards in all of virginia, and is home to some of the best wineries and breweries the state has to offer. I’m sure OP would love to see it developed into something practical, not just a money making scheme by developers who don’t care about the land
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
+1 Once OP is dead, no one else will care about this. It's stupid and selfish to try to control everything after you're dead. There's an affordable housing crisis but OP believes that future generations should pay homage to the (now unusable) land of her ancestors. Let the living use it how it best suits their needs.
OP clearly stated they don’t want the lane to be developed, and to preserve loudouns rural roots. Affordable housing should be strictly built in urban, residential existing areas, and keep the agricultural parts that way.
Most of the land we all live on now was once agricultural. What a ridiculous idea that it should stay that way in perpetuity just because OP doesn't like change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
+1 Once OP is dead, no one else will care about this. It's stupid and selfish to try to control everything after you're dead. There's an affordable housing crisis but OP believes that future generations should pay homage to the (now unusable) land of her ancestors. Let the living use it how it best suits their needs.
OP clearly stated they don’t want the lane to be developed, and to preserve loudouns rural roots. Affordable housing should be strictly built in urban, residential existing areas, and keep the agricultural parts that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior
+1 Once OP is dead, no one else will care about this. It's stupid and selfish to try to control everything after you're dead. There's an affordable housing crisis but OP believes that future generations should pay homage to the (now unusable) land of her ancestors. Let the living use it how it best suits their needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the conservation easement? No one is going to care about your heritage unless you have a relative to leave it to. How are you planning to fund the maintenance of the land after you're dead?
These types of egotistical preferences are for wealthy people with a desire to control from the grave.
OP already said that she didn’t want the land to be sold to a developer.
what a savior