Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
This is a broader issue where the cancer can spread. There is a gigantic issue if the fed has to bail out multiple banks;”:
1 execution, fed is horrible at executing on anything
2.money coming out of the fed is indeed bottomless, but at a very heavy price
3.More bail outs will cause generational harm to our economy.
This is no minor issue, especially with our the self sabatoging misery porn they will just keep the cycle of panic going.
The US government made $15B in profit on TARP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ouch Ally is on there. Or is that a different Ally?
No it's the same Ally.
Isn't Ally based in Hong Kong?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ouch Ally is on there. Or is that a different Ally?
No it's the same Ally.
Isn't Ally based in Hong Kong?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
This is a broader issue where the cancer can spread. There is a gigantic issue if the fed has to bail out multiple banks;”:
1 execution, fed is horrible at executing on anything
2.money coming out of the fed is indeed bottomless, but at a very heavy price
3.More bail outs will cause generational harm to our economy.
This is no minor issue, especially with our the self sabatoging misery porn they will just keep the cycle of panic going.
The US government made $15B in profit on TARP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
This is a broader issue where the cancer can spread. There is a gigantic issue if the fed has to bail out multiple banks;”:
1 execution, fed is horrible at executing on anything
2.money coming out of the fed is indeed bottomless, but at a very heavy price
3.More bail outs will cause generational harm to our economy.
This is no minor issue, especially with our the self sabatoging misery porn they will just keep the cycle of panic going.
The US government made $15B in profit on TARP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ouch Ally is on there. Or is that a different Ally?
No it's the same Ally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
This is a broader issue where the cancer can spread. There is a gigantic issue if the fed has to bail out multiple banks;”:
1 execution, fed is horrible at executing on anything
2.money coming out of the fed is indeed bottomless, but at a very heavy price
3.More bail outs will cause generational harm to our economy.
This is no minor issue, especially with our the self sabatoging misery porn they will just keep the cycle of panic going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sandy Spring Bank is on the list - can someone please tell me what this really means. Talk to me like I'm in 5th grade:
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20230311312/20-banks-that-are-sitting-on-huge-potential-securities-lossesas-was-svb
Luckily this link is broken, but articles like this are so irresponsible. Like yelling fire in a crowded theatre.
Interesting...
NP
I clicked on the link much earlier this morning and it was working then.
The article was very little substance. More akin to clickbait.
I agree it was irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
This is a broader issue where the cancer can spread. There is a gigantic issue if the fed has to bail out multiple banks;”:
1 execution, fed is horrible at executing on anything
2.money coming out of the fed is indeed bottomless, but at a very heavy price
3.More bail outs will cause generational harm to our economy.
This is no minor issue, especially with our the self sabatoging misery porn they will just keep the cycle of panic going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yawn
Whistle past the graveyard if you must...
My accounts at one of the banks on this list are well below the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit, so I'm really not at all worried about what would happen even in the somewhat unlikely event that it did fail. The same bank holds my mortgage, so who knows, maybe I'll get lucky and whoever buys their assets out of receivership will forget about me.
Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sandy Spring Bank is on the list - can someone please tell me what this really means. Talk to me like I'm in 5th grade:
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20230311312/20-banks-that-are-sitting-on-huge-potential-securities-lossesas-was-svb
Luckily this link is broken, but articles like this are so irresponsible. Like yelling fire in a crowded theatre.
Anonymous wrote:Sandy Spring Bank is on the list - can someone please tell me what this really means. Talk to me like I'm in 5th grade:
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20230311312/20-banks-that-are-sitting-on-huge-potential-securities-lossesas-was-svb
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yawn
Whistle past the graveyard if you must...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
No? The fed said specifically that that’s not what’s happening. SVB had enough from the sales of its securities to cover deposits.
This is inaccurate. The securities still sit on the balance sheet of the receiver bank. It will take some time to see if recoveries from SVB's assets (dominated by securities) will be sufficient to pay off all the depositors, insured and uninsured. If not, there will be an assessment on banks.
So where did the cash come from if it was not the banks securities and the govt did not bail out? All depositors were made whole today.
All the other banks in the US and their customers are bailing out SVB depositors.
Not the “taxpayer”.
So, most taxpayers who have relationships with banks.