Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Give me 50 reform Jewish kids, Hindus, Koreans and han Chinese — all from two parent households and all I need is a photocopier, an overhead projector from the 80s and a one room School house / even with dirt floors.
It would be one of the highest scoring schools in the north east
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Give me 50 reform Jewish kids, Hindus, Koreans and han Chinese — all from two parent households and all I need is a photocopier, an overhead projector from the 80s and a one room School house / even with dirt floors.
It would be one of the highest scoring schools in the north east
Anonymous wrote:And not the type of families who send their kids to that school? 95% of whether a school is considered "good" or not has nothing to do with how big their budget is. Good students make a school good, not the other way around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Give me 50 reform Jewish kids, Hindus, Koreans and han Chinese — all from two parent households and all I need is a photocopier, an overhead projector from the 80s and a one room School house / even with dirt floors.
It would be one of the highest scoring schools in the north east
Why aren’t Lee or Edison HSs in FCPS thriving then? Full of refugees
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Give me 50 reform Jewish kids, Hindus, Koreans and han Chinese — all from two parent households and all I need is a photocopier, an overhead projector from the 80s and a one room School house / even with dirt floors.
It would be one of the highest scoring schools in the north east
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Give me 50 reform Jewish kids, Hindus, Koreans and han Chinese — all from two parent households and all I need is a photocopier, an overhead projector from the 80s and a one room School house / even with dirt floors.
It would be one of the highest scoring schools in the north east
Anonymous wrote:Ever been to Connecticut? New Jersey? Pennsylvania?
Anonymous wrote:Is it because high SES families provide an atmosphere conducive to studying, or because they compensate for gaps in curriculum and teaching by tutoring their kids outside school?
Anonymous wrote:And not the type of families who send their kids to that school? 95% of whether a school is considered "good" or not has nothing to do with how big their budget is. Good students make a school good, not the other way around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only PART of the reason, OP. The other parts are:
1. Funding, management and educational direction of the school system.
2. In wealthy neighborhoods, parental pressure acting alongside teachers and staff looking to be hired in those schools, that work towards keeping the best teachers at those locations.
There are some incredibly well-funded failing schools in this country.
There's a point where no amount of money will make a difference. The underlying issue is families and values, which the state cannot legislate.
Nevertheless, even at some moderate to high FARMs schools, there are sufficiently large groups of high-performing students. Sure, an affluent school may have 8 sections of AP English whereas the higher FARMs school may have 3 but the same kid would do fine in either school since their success has more to do with family values and parental education.
Values. Ha. What an obnoxious attitude.
They track performance of kids who are from economically challenged families. Their performance varies greatly based on the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only PART of the reason, OP. The other parts are:
1. Funding, management and educational direction of the school system.
2. In wealthy neighborhoods, parental pressure acting alongside teachers and staff looking to be hired in those schools, that work towards keeping the best teachers at those locations.
There are some incredibly well-funded failing schools in this country.
There's a point where no amount of money will make a difference. The underlying issue is families and values, which the state cannot legislate.
Nevertheless, even at some moderate to high FARMs schools, there are sufficiently large groups of high-performing students. Sure, an affluent school may have 8 sections of AP English whereas the higher FARMs school may have 3 but the same kid would do fine in either school since their success has more to do with family values and parental education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only PART of the reason, OP. The other parts are:
1. Funding, management and educational direction of the school system.
2. In wealthy neighborhoods, parental pressure acting alongside teachers and staff looking to be hired in those schools, that work towards keeping the best teachers at those locations.
There are some incredibly well-funded failing schools in this country.