Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does MCPS directly notify parents if a kid is deemed “gifted”?
Our context is an immersion program, in case it matters.
Not in immersion, but I never learned if my kids were designated “gifted” in second. They were in CES lottery and compacted math, so I have to think they were, but no one ever confirmed. Because it doesn’t matter at all - it doesn’t impact placement or anything at all.
Anonymous wrote:Does MCPS directly notify parents if a kid is deemed “gifted”?
Our context is an immersion program, in case it matters.
Anonymous wrote:We filled it out, though according to the directions they gave for GT designation, it doesn't seem like our 7 yo will qualify, although she's 99th percentile on the math MAP, because her Dibels score wasn't that great. They had something (don't remember where) on how the kids could qualify for GT designation - they had to fulfill 3 or 4 criteria based on different tests + the behavioral questionnaire that the parents filled out or one filled out by the teacher. The tests included Dibels, math MAP, and some other math and English county tests that I believe we never got the results back on (so she may yet qualify, but I'm not counting on it). The math MAP cutoff was 80th percentile, so I'm a bit annoyed that DD probably won't qualify, but I'm also not sure it really matters.... (Her Dibels score also got dragged down by the "Decoding" part, where they read made-up-words, but her reading is actually really good, so I'm not concerned about it in the least.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is so complicated. Does that mean it concludes that reading score is a lot more important than math assessment score to be considered for GT program or enrichment program in mcps?
For the CES programs, yes. But for advanced-style courses at your own elementary school, no. If your ES uses ELC in grades 4 and 5, for example, prior performance on the MAP-R and in reading and writing is going to be the most important; if your ES teaches compacted math (Math 4/5 and Math 5/6), then the MAP-M and prior math performance are the important factors to get into those classes. At our ES the ELC class is basically also the compacted math class; there are only 1 or 2 kids who are in one and not the other. So this cohort has basically spent most of their time together for the last two years. Fortunately it's a great group of kids - we are lucky.
Just so everyone knows the programs you mention (CES and ELC and compacted math) are entirely unrelated to this second grade parent survey. That “gifted and talented” state identification of meaningless and doesn’t mean your child will or will not receive any different instruction or extra enrichment.
Anonymous wrote:We filled it out, though according to the directions they gave for GT designation, it doesn't seem like our 7 yo will qualify, although she's 99th percentile on the math MAP, because her Dibels score wasn't that great. They had something (don't remember where) on how the kids could qualify for GT designation - they had to fulfill 3 or 4 criteria based on different tests + the behavioral questionnaire that the parents filled out or one filled out by the teacher. The tests included Dibels, math MAP, and some other math and English county tests that I believe we never got the results back on (so she may yet qualify, but I'm not counting on it). The math MAP cutoff was 80th percentile, so I'm a bit annoyed that DD probably won't qualify, but I'm also not sure it really matters.... (Her Dibels score also got dragged down by the "Decoding" part, where they read made-up-words, but her reading is actually really good, so I'm not concerned about it in the least.)
Anonymous wrote:Is meaningless not of meaningless, sorry for typo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is so complicated. Does that mean it concludes that reading score is a lot more important than math assessment score to be considered for GT program or enrichment program in mcps?
For the CES programs, yes. But for advanced-style courses at your own elementary school, no. If your ES uses ELC in grades 4 and 5, for example, prior performance on the MAP-R and in reading and writing is going to be the most important; if your ES teaches compacted math (Math 4/5 and Math 5/6), then the MAP-M and prior math performance are the important factors to get into those classes. At our ES the ELC class is basically also the compacted math class; there are only 1 or 2 kids who are in one and not the other. So this cohort has basically spent most of their time together for the last two years. Fortunately it's a great group of kids - we are lucky.
Anonymous wrote:It is so complicated. Does that mean it concludes that reading score is a lot more important than math assessment score to be considered for GT program or enrichment program in mcps?