Anonymous wrote:

Yup. Must be looking at private polls.

The conservative candidate will be crushed by the liberal candidate.

Anonymous wrote:

awesome!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dem will cruise to victory. Dems are taking WI back. It’s really the choice issue. It will be huge again in ‘24. WI is gerrymandered (as are other states, to be reasonable about it). My question there, for all you political people out there is, isn’t that a done deal for 10 years?

The gerrymandered maps?

Yes—every 10 years, I think.

Anonymous wrote:The Dem will cruise to victory. Dems are taking WI back. It’s really the choice issue. It will be huge again in ‘24. WI is gerrymandered (as are other states, to be reasonable about it). My question there, for all you political people out there is, isn’t that a done deal for 10 years?

The gerrymandered maps?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

California has an independent commission.

And I have a bridge in ….

Do you have a brain? Actual Democratic gerrymandering could reduce the number of Republican House seats in California to two. There are ten now. This doesn’t even look that bad.

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/california-redistricting

No need to spit anger about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

California has an independent commission.

And I have a bridge in ….

Do you have a brain? Actual Democratic gerrymandering could reduce the number of Republican House seats in California to two. There are ten now. This doesn’t even look that bad.

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/california-redistricting

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

California has an independent commission.

As does NY. In fact, the ungerrymandered NY map is what handed the house to the Rs.

The Dem will cruise to victory. Dems are taking WI back. It’s really the choice issue. It will be huge again in ‘24. WI is gerrymandered (as are other states, to be reasonable about it). My question there, for all you political people out there is, isn’t that a done deal for 10 years?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

California has an independent commission.

And I have a bridge in ….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

Don't be obtuse. The GOP does this far more extensively than Dems to. BY FAR. But, to answer you, I'm not ok with it. But until the GOP stops trying to undermine democracy in this country, it's not a top issue for me. Without Gerrymandering, the GOP would be far less successful in TX, NC, OH. Huge states with huge electoral counts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

Dp- here’s a deal, dems ungerrymander the 2 or 3 states they’ve gerrymandered, when republicans fix the 22 states they’ve gerrymandered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh, yeah. That's a big one too. Due to gerrymandering, right now Dems would have to win somehting like 65% of the vote statewide to get in the majority in the state house and senate. So even though they have a Dem governor, the legislature is overwhelmingly Republican because the maps are so bad. It sucks.

Are you OK when Democrats do the gerrymandering, like in NY, Ill, MD, and Calif?

California has an independent commission.