Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given the things you like about Reed, you might also want to consider other liberal arts schools that focus on undergraduate education. USNews has such a list, based on reputation (Reed ranks at #16):
1. Carleton
2. Amherst
3. Agnes Scott
3. Bowdoin
3. Davidson
6. Grinnell
6. Swarthmore
8. Bates
9. Colorado College
9. Pomona
11. Macalester
11. Wellesley
13. Bryn Mawr
13. College of Wooster
15. Middlebury
16. Berea
16. Reed
16. Smith
19. Kenyon
19. Spelman
etc. (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
As a Williams grad, I'm stunned at how low the College is in undergraduate teaching (23rd). Haven't looked at the methodology for the ranking, but I hope Williams is trying to see if they have a real problem which can be addressed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - what are you thinking? This is a pretty damning set of comments...
DP: I wouldn't rely on DCUM for advice--it often just amplifies a stereotype.
Anonymous wrote:OP - what are you thinking? This is a pretty damning set of comments...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking seriously at Reed for our son, who has a deep interest in history.
It seems like a good environment. Socially progressive but academically traditional. No modern flashy majors. No business or marketing. A focus on liberal arts and sciences.
I've been very impressed with Oxford and Cambridge graduates where the emphasis is on depth rather than breadth. A lot of people even at Ivies often graduate with only a superficial knowledge of their subjects. The average Oxbridge history grad probably knows much as history as an American MA in history.
Reed seems to get the balance right. They get a general education in the humanities and distribution requirements, but in-depth study of their subjects including a required thesis for all.
Very high number of students go on to get PhD's too. Only moderately competitive in terms of admissions, but self-selected. This isn't a trendy college, or somewhere where management consultants recruit etc.
Can anyone speak to the Reed experience?
OMG I would not describe the actual, real life Reed culture like what you were saying at all. Look at St Johns in Annapolis instead. Reed seriously has always had a lot of unstable kids, with a VERY small Uber left intellectual group that the market the heck out of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given the things you like about Reed, you might also want to consider other liberal arts schools that focus on undergraduate education. USNews has such a list, based on reputation (Reed ranks at #16):
1. Carleton
2. Amherst
3. Agnes Scott
3. Bowdoin
3. Davidson
6. Grinnell
6. Swarthmore
8. Bates
9. Colorado College
9. Pomona
11. Macalester
11. Wellesley
13. Bryn Mawr
13. College of Wooster
15. Middlebury
16. Berea
16. Reed
16. Smith
19. Kenyon
19. Spelman
etc. (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
As a Williams grad, I'm stunned at how low the College is in undergraduate teaching (23rd). Haven't looked at the methodology for the ranking, but I hope Williams is trying to see if they have a real problem which can be addressed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given the things you like about Reed, you might also want to consider other liberal arts schools that focus on undergraduate education. USNews has such a list, based on reputation (Reed ranks at #16):
1. Carleton
2. Amherst
3. Agnes Scott
3. Bowdoin
3. Davidson
6. Grinnell
6. Swarthmore
8. Bates
9. Colorado College
9. Pomona
11. Macalester
11. Wellesley
13. Bryn Mawr
13. College of Wooster
15. Middlebury
16. Berea
16. Reed
16. Smith
19. Kenyon
19. Spelman
etc. (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
As a Williams grad, I'm stunned at how low the College is in undergraduate teaching (23rd). Haven't looked at the methodology for the ranking, but I hope Williams is trying to see if they have a real problem which can be addressed.
Anonymous wrote:I have known two people who graduated from there. One of them is a heroin addict. This is not recent but I don’t think the drug culture has changed too much. It’s a very intense and intellectual place. Probably not helpful info but it’s what I know.
Anonymous wrote:Given the things you like about Reed, you might also want to consider other liberal arts schools that focus on undergraduate education. USNews has such a list, based on reputation (Reed ranks at #16):
1. Carleton
2. Amherst
3. Agnes Scott
3. Bowdoin
3. Davidson
6. Grinnell
6. Swarthmore
8. Bates
9. Colorado College
9. Pomona
11. Macalester
11. Wellesley
13. Bryn Mawr
13. College of Wooster
15. Middlebury
16. Berea
16. Reed
16. Smith
19. Kenyon
19. Spelman
etc. (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
Anonymous wrote:The DD of my close friend goes there. She is transferring to University of Oregon in the fall. Loves Oregon, but Reed is very small and very stressful.
Anonymous wrote:Looking seriously at Reed for our son, who has a deep interest in history.
It seems like a good environment. Socially progressive but academically traditional. No modern flashy majors. No business or marketing. A focus on liberal arts and sciences.
I've been very impressed with Oxford and Cambridge graduates where the emphasis is on depth rather than breadth. A lot of people even at Ivies often graduate with only a superficial knowledge of their subjects. The average Oxbridge history grad probably knows much as history as an American MA in history.
Reed seems to get the balance right. They get a general education in the humanities and distribution requirements, but in-depth study of their subjects including a required thesis for all.
Very high number of students go on to get PhD's too. Only moderately competitive in terms of admissions, but self-selected. This isn't a trendy college, or somewhere where management consultants recruit etc.
Can anyone speak to the Reed experience?
Anonymous wrote:very high % students go on to get PHDs
Why is this good? They couldn’t get employed with an undergrad degree? What fields warrant a PHD? Universities are cutting tenure so the future of the Professor path forward is bleak.