Anonymous wrote:MIL started out ok, FIL neutral, BIL rude. FIL died and over time MIL was controlling, no boundaries, clanish and when I politely pushed back she began a crusade with DH re how bad I was. He ignored her for a long time bUT finally told her to stop. By that point the relationship was ruined. I’ve seen her twice in 4 years and I’m polite but that’s it. And, I mostly do that for my kids.
BIL and I have found a way forward but that’s because I forgive a lot of bad behavior because I love my SIL
Anonymous wrote:They didn’t welcome me but expected our family to go to the ends of the earth to support them when they needed help. When they didn’t do the same for us in a time of need, like even ask how I am, I decided I no longer gave a crap to visit them. Guess what? Now they barely call (per their usual emotionally unavailable selves) and probably resent we don’t make the long trek to see them because DH knows it’s a lot to do on his own with the kids. If you don’t show a basic interest in me and my kids, it’s not worth my time and effort to try to please you. [/quote]
+1
Favoritism (only supporting the grown adult child that looks/acts like you) can be a real problem, also - remember that child also has your bad points, so be open and equal to ALL of your grandchildren.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL told my DH he was making a mistake marrying me. We now have 5 kids and have been married 20+ years. She was never warm and always judgmental of me while my FIL was always lovely and kind. Up until he died I was engaged in their family. Not a lot but would do the visits. Since my FIL died I haven't seen or spoken to my MIL. She doesn't live close so my DH sees her but I don't make the effort or care. She is still rude.
Anonymous wrote:Despite the fact that there is clear evidence (at least on DCUM) that toxic inlaws can totally affect and possibly ruin a marriage I have still never heard of anyone who decided against marrying a person just because of the inlaws.
You can warn people all you want that it will probably never change as time goes on but in the throes of early love literally no one listens to this advice.
Anonymous wrote:So for those who say they don’t interfere with husbands relationship with parents, does he allow them to be rude to you and you just don’t care that he doesn’t stand up for you?
Anonymous wrote:If they aren't warm and welcoming at the beginning you forgive like I did. If they just get worse and create tons of drama, you distance like I did, but don't interfere with your husband's relationship with them. He decided on his own he had enough. No regrets. Many of them no longer talk to eachother. The mean siblings have gone through multiple marriages and can't seem to get along with others. I never said a harsh word to any of them. I remained polite, but very distant with many boundaries. Dysfucntional people are going to be dysfunctional unless they break the cycle and get help.[/quote]
+1
So true! Yes, I need to remember that DH grew up with this, they don't seem to like each other, and they are accustomed to their behaviors, so let it be.
Anonymous wrote:I am 24 years into a marriage with in-laws like this. I have to keep reminding myself that it's my choice to allow them to affect me. But the reality is, I do feel they ruined my marriage and much of my adult life. If I had to do it over, I would not have married my husband because his parents are so dismissive of me. They are extremely wealthy. I grew up UMC, raised by parents who grew up in poverty and built an incredible life for us. There is no reason for my ILs to look down on me, but they always have. And it causes my husband to feel the same way a lot of the time. When we are around them, it brings the absolute worst out of him. I actually broke up with him after I met his family, because I just knew they weren't for me. But he worked hard to win me back. OP, do not fool yourself into believing it will get better. It won't. People do not change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s a big difference between “not warm and welcoming” and being overtly rude, judgmental and mean-spirited. If they are cordial to you, that is all that is required.
Yeah, she is like this. Whatever is "required", flat affect, snarky, cold, that type of thing - clannish, insular, not inclusive unless they need something....
PP who said DIL is "wrong side of the tracks" - like that.
What I am deliberately avoiding is the typical DCUM "she said/she said" and pettiness about a particular situation trope, that sidetracks the general question.
You don't have to answer if you don't want to.
Huh? I responded because your thread title and your original post don’t line up. The behavior you are describing is rude—it’s bad behavior. That’s a far cry from people being “not warm and welcoming to you.” I know many people who are not warm and welcoming, but they are at least civil/cordial/neutral. Do you not understand that your thread title and the behavior you described in your original post are two entirely different things?
It is actually both, thank you for asking.
Pick a lane. There is nothing wrong with not being “warm and welcoming.” That’s just…neutral. What you are describing is actively negative behavior. And frankly I’m starting to see why you aren’t liked.