Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey OP, we came into 6th grade without any MAP scores in the last few years...we were overseas and they didn't give the test during the pandemic. We had a teacher rec, and they placed us in HIGH/AIM (and she's done fine, has pretty much had an A+ in both classes and in 99th percentile since taking the exam again).
This anecdote, and a dozen like it, point out that kids' math capabilities early on are, typically, more advanced than the level at which we teach in the US. Other education-focused countries are quick to provide the challenge that we denigrate as bound to privilege.
Not saying that the PP's DC isn't highly capable, on top of whatever overseas instruction might have been afforded.
Anonymous wrote:Hey OP, we came into 6th grade without any MAP scores in the last few years...we were overseas and they didn't give the test during the pandemic. We had a teacher rec, and they placed us in HIGH/AIM (and she's done fine, has pretty much had an A+ in both classes and in 99th percentile since taking the exam again).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My youngest is in 5th and scored 251 on MAP-M on the most recent test. He has been centrally identified for AIM and he has a teacher recommendation for AIM in 6ht grade.
Our 5th grade teacher said they only could choose 6 or 6+ for a rec. Did your teacher rec come in as AIM before the central identification letter went out, or could it be that the system changes it from whatever the teacher selects to AIM if centrally identified?
Also, where do you see the rec? ParentVUE somewhere?
Is Math 6+ AIM? They changed the names to fit the new curriculum.