Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS keeps this on the down low for sure.
I do have several kids in MCPS high schools and I don’t love the fact that they don’t get to move as quickly as they might in a “real” Honors class, but they will survive, and I’m glad that MCPS is at least trying something. Because the achievement gap is shameful.
Anyway, it’s in 11th grade that the split happens- the on level kids stay in Honors Whatever 11 and the others head off to AP classes.
So maybe the mixing in 9th and 10th is good- nobody should be tracked as low achieving/likely not to succeed already at age 14! That’s horrible. Especially if historically the tracking system was racist, or at least perpetuated racism.
How does this close the achievement gap?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been happening in ES and MS for years. Now, MCPS is extending the same concept to HS.
Our MS only offers one English class - Advanced English. It is a mix of kids who are very proficient and some kids who are ESOL and kids who are at grade level.
MCPS doesn’t support differentiation because it is not Equitable.
Unfortunately, this system helps nobody. The kids who are below level just struggle, even with ‘supports’ in place and often end up being disruptive because they’re not engaged in learning. And the kids who are above grade level get bored and disengage.
So they're achieving equity by dumbing everyone down to the least common denominator?
That's not good since most on-level classes today seem remedial and honors was more like average.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
There might be a group at the MCCPTA level, but honestly MCPS doesn't seem to care about what the MCCPTA thinks or does.
Don't think anyone should really care about MCCPTA, either. I trust professionals who base these decisions on actual data and analysis.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS keeps this on the down low for sure.
I do have several kids in MCPS high schools and I don’t love the fact that they don’t get to move as quickly as they might in a “real” Honors class, but they will survive, and I’m glad that MCPS is at least trying something. Because the achievement gap is shameful.
Anyway, it’s in 11th grade that the split happens- the on level kids stay in Honors Whatever 11 and the others head off to AP classes.
So maybe the mixing in 9th and 10th is good- nobody should be tracked as low achieving/likely not to succeed already at age 14! That’s horrible. Especially if historically the tracking system was racist, or at least perpetuated racism.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS keeps this on the down low for sure.
I do have several kids in MCPS high schools and I don’t love the fact that they don’t get to move as quickly as they might in a “real” Honors class, but they will survive, and I’m glad that MCPS is at least trying something. Because the achievement gap is shameful.
Anyway, it’s in 11th grade that the split happens- the on level kids stay in Honors Whatever 11 and the others head off to AP classes.
So maybe the mixing in 9th and 10th is good- nobody should be tracked as low achieving/likely not to succeed already at age 14! That’s horrible. Especially if historically the tracking system was racist, or at least perpetuated racism.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS keeps this on the down low for sure.
I do have several kids in MCPS high schools and I don’t love the fact that they don’t get to move as quickly as they might in a “real” Honors class, but they will survive, and I’m glad that MCPS is at least trying something. Because the achievement gap is shameful.
Anyway, it’s in 11th grade that the split happens- the on level kids stay in Honors Whatever 11 and the others head off to AP classes.
So maybe the mixing in 9th and 10th is good- nobody should be tracked as low achieving/likely not to succeed already at age 14! That’s horrible. Especially if historically the tracking system was racist, or at least perpetuated racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
There might be a group at the MCCPTA level, but honestly MCPS doesn't seem to care about what the MCCPTA thinks or does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
I have no idea how many schools or classes or using this model, but I would guess 95% of the parents have no idea it is happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
I have no idea how many schools or classes or using this model, but I would guess 95% of the parents have no idea it is happening.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?
MCPS doesn’t care what parents think. Maybe if teachers and admin opposed it, that would get some traction?
MCPS has stated for years that its main priority is closing the Achievement Gap. That is a difficult task, and this makes it appear as if it is working.
Check in with your PTA, but it’s unlikely you will get very far.
Anonymous wrote:It’s so tough. I know a teacher who said he used to be able to tell which class was honors and which was on level just by glancing in the door. Black and brown? On level. More than a few white kids? Honors. This is in a diverse MCPS high school. The on level classes were ROUGH to teach- lots of behavior issues. Now there is this weird mix, but I do think it’s more equitable. I am not a POC but I can only imagine how that would feel seeing that every day. We have to do better in terms of leveling the playing field. I don’t know how else we can do it. This is a start, anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have any idea what percentage of parents oppose this model, and whether there is an organized group in place to oppose it?