Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Yes, but applicant has to be qualified. The consultant will be able to assess which school is a better fit first.
No, the applicant has to be able to afford the consultant. Then the consultant does the assessment and recommends schools. Money first and if you don’t have it, your qualifications won’t matter.
Does it increase the chances of your child getting in? Having a consultant I mean?
As mentioned above, I think the best way to look at it is that a consultant will not help your unqualified kid get into a school that they would not have otherwise. However, a consultant with relationships in admissions can help your otherwise qualified applicant at least be seen versus other qualified kids. Take that for what it’s worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Yes, but applicant has to be qualified. The consultant will be able to assess which school is a better fit first.
No, the applicant has to be able to afford the consultant. Then the consultant does the assessment and recommends schools. Money first and if you don’t have it, your qualifications won’t matter.
That’s worth a lot. It’s my understanding. A lot of qualified kids don’t get in because of the high numbers of qualified kids.
Does it increase the chances of your child getting in? Having a consultant I mean?
As mentioned above, I think the best way to look at it is that a consultant will not help your unqualified kid get into a school that they would not have otherwise. However, a consultant with relationships in admissions can help your otherwise qualified applicant at least be seen versus other qualified kids. Take that for what it’s worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you end up deciding for a Consultant, I would look for someone that has relationships with current admission directors and willing to speak on your behalf to them (after meeting your child).
Can you please recommend someone like this? Do you know of any connected consultants in particular?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Yes, but applicant has to be qualified. The consultant will be able to assess which school is a better fit first.
No, the applicant has to be able to afford the consultant. Then the consultant does the assessment and recommends schools. Money first and if you don’t have it, your qualifications won’t matter.
Does it increase the chances of your child getting in? Having a consultant I mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Yes, but applicant has to be qualified. The consultant will be able to assess which school is a better fit first.
No, the applicant has to be able to afford the consultant. Then the consultant does the assessment and recommends schools. Money first and if you don’t have it, your qualifications won’t matter.
Anonymous wrote:If you end up deciding for a Consultant, I would look for someone that has relationships with current admission directors and willing to speak on your behalf to them (after meeting your child).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Yes, but applicant has to be qualified. The consultant will be able to assess which school is a better fit first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We liked working with Lindsay White.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.
It’s pay to play and money talks. That’s how private works.
Anonymous wrote:Exactly, and I'll echo that they absolutely speak with the consultants. There is an implicit "deal" where the consultants to not promote unqualified students and in exchange, seem to have a bit of sway when they actually recommend someone.