Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The access problems is that there are a lot of classes in the portables so unless kids hold the door open for other kids there isn’t an effective way to get from portable classrooms to your next class. If the kids have to walk all the way around to the front door they won’t make it to their next class.
But I think they will be moving to visible ID cards like WJHS does. Apparently it has worked well at WJ and would be an easy way for kids to know who is supposed to be allowed in building. More security guards at the doors would help too but that’s a more expensive fix (and also requires there to be people that are willing to do that job) so I’m not holding my breath. I also support bringing back and expanding the SRO program, and it would not surprise me if that happens, but MCPD is also wildly understaffed with massive recruitment problems so not clear they could even staff that program.
There’s no great answer for the fact that this country is awash in guns.
+ 1 RM parent
One reason I hate portables. So unsecure.
RM just added several more portables this year. They are here to stay and likely we will see more in the future.
You can thank our local politicians who have pushed so hard for more and more high density development in that area! We have even more kids coming to that cluster in the next 5 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need to start being more open to weapon detection technologies in schools. I'd rather see this than those electric busses they spent a bunch of money on but could barely mobilize.
I think it will make kids even later to class (which is already a struggle given how congested the hallways are and how large th property is), and I'm not at all optimistic that they can find adequately trained staff to operate metal detectors effectively. Even the TSA has a shockingly high fail rate in locating guns in baggage -- and they are trained a lot more thoroughly, and have better equipment, than MCPS is going to get. I've talked to LEO that operate metal detectors and they say it is really not that easy and requires a trained eye -- it's not like in the movies where you see the outline of a gun against a stack of clothing.
See this article, which highlights how metal detectors are not necessary as easy as they seem:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595716.pdf
I favor bringing back SROs, increasing security especially at doors and bathrooms, and requiring visible display of picture ID cards --- but not metal detectors or closing the campus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The access problems is that there are a lot of classes in the portables so unless kids hold the door open for other kids there isn’t an effective way to get from portable classrooms to your next class. If the kids have to walk all the way around to the front door they won’t make it to their next class.
But I think they will be moving to visible ID cards like WJHS does. Apparently it has worked well at WJ and would be an easy way for kids to know who is supposed to be allowed in building. More security guards at the doors would help too but that’s a more expensive fix (and also requires there to be people that are willing to do that job) so I’m not holding my breath. I also support bringing back and expanding the SRO program, and it would not surprise me if that happens, but MCPD is also wildly understaffed with massive recruitment problems so not clear they could even staff that program.
There’s no great answer for the fact that this country is awash in guns.
+ 1 RM parent
One reason I hate portables. So unsecure.
RM just added several more portables this year. They are here to stay and likely we will see more in the future.
You can thank our local politicians who have pushed so hard for more and more high density development in that area! We have even more kids coming to that cluster in the next 5 years.
Anonymous wrote:We need to start being more open to weapon detection technologies in schools. I'd rather see this than those electric busses they spent a bunch of money on but could barely mobilize.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid at RM. Also didn't hear about this until the email out, and she stays after school for an extracurricular activity.
I would like to know how this individual got INTO the school? AGAIN?? How are these people so easily gaining access to our schools?
People open doors for people. This is just basic human behavior. If your strategy depends on people not opening doors for people, your strategy will fail.
Fair enough. So, are we just resigned to the fact that anybody (adult or child) has access to our kids' schools? I guess that's the case, but our elementary school seems to do a great job of keeping people out who are not supposed to be there. One entrance and nobody can get in who isn't authorized. Also, we need to provide ID to be at the school. Is there anyway to do something similar at our high schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another question I have is why RM always deals with RPD instead of MCPD, which has more resources and more expansive policing powers. ROD does property crimes in Rockville retail areas, but if this is related to drug sales or gang activity, it should be routed to MCPD.
Maybe the Rockville PD also deals with gang/drug activity? I’m sure the MCPD and the RPD regularly work together, in any case.
I’m sure this incident, like the last one, was relayed to gangs/drugs. Clearly the trespasser was looking for someone in particular.
Or it could've been a social media dispute where one was mocking the other....or it could have been over a girl.
Teenagers fight over a lot of things. Some serious and some really stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like MCPS went above and beyond to handle this issue well as usual.
No, I think MCPS did a good job informing parents after the event.
The Police did a good job finding the individual and arresting him.
+1 I'm an RM parent. I'm satisfied with the communication, and how quickly they apprehended him, a 15 yr old btw. Gad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another question I have is why RM always deals with RPD instead of MCPD, which has more resources and more expansive policing powers. ROD does property crimes in Rockville retail areas, but if this is related to drug sales or gang activity, it should be routed to MCPD.
Maybe the Rockville PD also deals with gang/drug activity? I’m sure the MCPD and the RPD regularly work together, in any case.
I’m sure this incident, like the last one, was relayed to gangs/drugs. Clearly the trespasser was looking for someone in particular.
Anonymous wrote:Another question I have is why RM always deals with RPD instead of MCPD, which has more resources and more expansive policing powers. ROD does property crimes in Rockville retail areas, but if this is related to drug sales or gang activity, it should be routed to MCPD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like MCPS went above and beyond to handle this issue well as usual.
No, I think MCPS did a good job informing parents after the event.
The Police did a good job finding the individual and arresting him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The access problems is that there are a lot of classes in the portables so unless kids hold the door open for other kids there isn’t an effective way to get from portable classrooms to your next class. If the kids have to walk all the way around to the front door they won’t make it to their next class.
But I think they will be moving to visible ID cards like WJHS does. Apparently it has worked well at WJ and would be an easy way for kids to know who is supposed to be allowed in building. More security guards at the doors would help too but that’s a more expensive fix (and also requires there to be people that are willing to do that job) so I’m not holding my breath. I also support bringing back and expanding the SRO program, and it would not surprise me if that happens, but MCPD is also wildly understaffed with massive recruitment problems so not clear they could even staff that program.
There’s no great answer for the fact that this country is awash in guns.
+ 1 RM parent
One reason I hate portables. So unsecure.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like MCPS went above and beyond to handle this issue well as usual.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like MCPS went above and beyond to handle this issue well as usual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another question I have is why RM always deals with RPD instead of MCPD, which has more resources and more expansive policing powers. ROD does property crimes in Rockville retail areas, but if this is related to drug sales or gang activity, it should be routed to MCPD.
Because Rockville is a city, and has Rockville PD.