Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember all the AEM people defending her after her typo filled letter? Remember how dissenters were called racist for critiquing a black woman? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You don't see any difference between typos and embezzlement? Ok....

The common thread is that she was operating autonomously and there were no checks and balances.

Exactly but if you said on negative thing about her, the AEM racist patrol would be in control.

There is some serious racist trash on AEM. Glad someone is calling them out.

???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember all the AEM people defending her after her typo filled letter? Remember how dissenters were called racist for critiquing a black woman? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You don't see any difference between typos and embezzlement? Ok....

The common thread is that she was operating autonomously and there were no checks and balances.

Exactly but if you said on negative thing about her, the AEM racist patrol would be in control.

There is some serious racist trash on AEM. Glad someone is calling them out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember all the AEM people defending her after her typo filled letter? Remember how dissenters were called racist for critiquing a black woman? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You don't see any difference between typos and embezzlement? Ok....

The common thread is that she was operating autonomously and there were no checks and balances.

Exactly but if you said on negative thing about her, the AEM racist patrol would be in control.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That org handles that much money? And no one noticed??

This happens all the time with nonprofits. It’s so disgusting.

Uh, it does?

Not any with any financial controls in place.

Ha. You think financial controls by themselves will stop embezzlement or other breaches of fiduciary duty? No, all companies are at risk. Of course if they don’t have tight financial controls they are more susceptible, but somebody will almost always figure out a way around things. This is true in all sectors but nonprofits do make up a disproportionate percentage of fraud cases.

And maybe “common” is an overstatement , but it’s definitely not uncommon.

Captain Ryan Lazisky with the Fairfax County Police Department told Fox 5 that embezzlement cases in teacher unions are more common than people think.

"It's unfortunate that people will take advantage," Captain Lazisky told FOX 5. "That association is set up and built to protect teachers, so it's sad to see that teachers were taken advantage of. This money is for them."

Anonymous wrote:So what are the checks and balances now- do they have an annual audit? At a non-profit I volunteered for, we had Board Members who reviewed the financials each year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember all the AEM people defending her after her typo filled letter? Remember how dissenters were called racist for critiquing a black woman? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You don't see any difference between typos and embezzlement? Ok....

The common thread is that she was operating autonomously and there were no checks and balances.

Anonymous wrote:So what are the checks and balances now- do they have an annual audit? At a non-profit I volunteered for, we had Board Members who reviewed the financials each year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember all the AEM people defending her after her typo filled letter? Remember how dissenters were called racist for critiquing a black woman? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

You don't see any difference between typos and embezzlement? Ok....