Anonymous wrote:Ignore it. The complainant misheard you, you proved it with the recording, end of story. If it'll make you feel better, confirm with your colleague that the information from the recording was shared with the complainant, and that she has been disabused of the false notion that she was told to keep quiet.
This isn't about you, it's about someone who misheard or misinterpreted your clear statement. That's outside your control, and is not a "microaggression" or any other kind of discourteous conduct on your part.
you can't control how others react to you, but you can control your own emotions - this is a trivial incident which should have no consequences for you whatsoever, and is hardly worth agonizing over as you seem to be doing.
Anonymous wrote:I completely disagree with PP. You should ask to speak to Asian American woman directly. It sounds like she is upset not only with the incorrect statement but how she feels she was treated during the interview. It can be exhausting for soft spoken women of any race that have to compete for space with their louder male colleagues and in this day and age, sophisticated professionals should be able to see that and mitigate it where necessary. That means speaking to the woman as much as speaking to the man regardless of how loud the man is. You need to apologize for that part at least and do better next time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ignore it. The complainant misheard you, you proved it with the recording, end of story. If it'll make you feel better, confirm with your colleague that the information from the recording was shared with the complainant, and that she has been disabused of the false notion that she was told to keep quiet.
This isn't about you, it's about someone who misheard or misinterpreted your clear statement. That's outside your control, and is not a "microaggression" or any other kind of discourteous conduct on your part.
you can't control how others react to you, but you can control your own emotions - this is a trivial incident which should have no consequences for you whatsoever, and is hardly worth agonizing over as you seem to be doing.
100% this.
The only learning experience for you going forward - ask who the primary author is. And, possibly be more cognizant of equaling out the quotes especially when co-authors are not the same gender/race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should’ve shut the co-author down and intentionally solicited comments from the soft-spoken lead author. An apology is warranted and you should feel sick.
I think there’s some value in this comment for guidance in the future. I think men often talk over women and a skillful interviewer would tactfully shut them down, especially in this context. What strikes me here is that both were actively engaged so you needed to gain control. And after you gained control, you ended up with more quotable quotes from the man. Why is that? Did the female stop engaging? Did you make efforts to draw her out? Did he monopolize the interview and if so how did you respond? I really think this is something you should look at before you figure out next steps.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like the Asian woman was victimized by the co-author, not you, If he was speaking over her. If that's what happened, you don't need to own that, and it's not your job to fix him.
Still, I'm not a company owner, so take with a grain of salt, but you could reach out to the woman, I'd be very brief, anything you say could be used against you because she's already making allegations, and simply let her know you were informed she thought you stated "X," but that you stated "Y" because you absolutely wanted to hear her and not miss what she was trying to say. And you apologize if she did not hear it correctly and for any misunderstanding.
Anonymous wrote:Ignore it. The complainant misheard you, you proved it with the recording, end of story. If it'll make you feel better, confirm with your colleague that the information from the recording was shared with the complainant, and that she has been disabused of the false notion that she was told to keep quiet.
This isn't about you, it's about someone who misheard or misinterpreted your clear statement. That's outside your control, and is not a "microaggression" or any other kind of discourteous conduct on your part.
you can't control how others react to you, but you can control your own emotions - this is a trivial incident which should have no consequences for you whatsoever, and is hardly worth agonizing over as you seem to be doing.
Anonymous wrote:You should’ve shut the co-author down and intentionally solicited comments from the soft-spoken lead author. An apology is warranted and you should feel sick.