Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am fine with that. College admissions needs a massive overhaul.
Depending on what the Supreme Court says, one of the biggest changes will be elimination of any sort of “Women in STEM” outreach programs, preferences, or scholarships.
Be careful what you (ignorantly) wish for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am fine with that. College admissions needs a massive overhaul.
Depending on what the Supreme Court says, one of the biggest changes will be elimination of any sort of “Women in STEM” outreach programs, preferences, or scholarships.
Be careful what you (ignorantly) wish for.
On the flip side, overall admission is harder for women because they tend to do much better in high school than boys. Women in tech may go away, but so will the higher bars to get into colleges in general
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile ACB’s daughter goes to Notre Dame as a legacy after graduating from a “People of Praise” secondary school.
And Ketanji Brown Jackson’s daughter goes to Harvard as a legacy. Realistically, don’t you think their kids would be getting into any college they want because their parents are on the Supreme Court?
Site but her daughter also went to an outstanding secondary school where that’s not unusual. People of Praise, however…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Additionally, I think a by-product of the Supreme Court ruling will be the dismantlement of the historically black colleges and universities. They will no longer qualify for federal funding because that would be “racist” under the SC’s twisted logic. I give HCBUs maybe a decade before the vast majority are shut down due to disqualification for federal funds and programs.
The consequences of this decision will be Orwellian.
Trump wholeheartedly supported HBCUs.
Trump never wholehearted supported anything but Trump and KFC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am fine with that. College admissions needs a massive overhaul.
Depending on what the Supreme Court says, one of the biggest changes will be elimination of any sort of “Women in STEM” outreach programs, preferences, or scholarships.
Be careful what you (ignorantly) wish for.
Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see whether the ruling prohibits consideration of gender.
I don’t see why colleges would eliminate preference for athletes if affirmative action is banned. What’s the rationale?
I understand why ED and legacy could be eliminated but it may not be in the colleges’ interests to do so.
Anonymous wrote:This could help students at more diverse high schools get in if that is used as a proxy for diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile ACB’s daughter goes to Notre Dame as a legacy after graduating from a “People of Praise” secondary school.
And Ketanji Brown Jackson’s daughter goes to Harvard as a legacy. Realistically, don’t you think their kids would be getting into any college they want because their parents are on the Supreme Court?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile ACB’s daughter goes to Notre Dame as a legacy after graduating from a “People of Praise” secondary school.
And Ketanji Brown Jackson’s daughter goes to Harvard as a legacy. Realistically, don’t you think their kids would be getting into any college they want because their parents are on the Supreme Court?
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile ACB’s daughter goes to Notre Dame as a legacy after graduating from a “People of Praise” secondary school.