Anonymous wrote:
Small family bias, true, but rightfully so.
Kids take money lots of it. Kids need attention lots of it. When people have these large families mom isn't raising these kids the older siblings are.
Anonymous wrote:1) If they’re not asking for your advice, say nothing. MYOB.
2) There’s a reason you (generally) have them one at a time. High likelihood they end up choosing to have fewer kids than that (don’t say this to them! This is an FYI for you)
3) If they are asking for your advice, don’t ask at DCUM. There’s a real small family bias here. Even 3 kids is seen as an outlier. As is the case in high cost of living places among upper middle class professionals. That’s a demo that has 1-3 kids, not more. But there are plenty of people all over the country, and even here in the DC area, that have 4 or more kids. Those are the people to talk to about this. Not randos on DCUM. I’d be shocked if anyone who responded so far has 4 kids.
Anonymous wrote:Only that it makes it hard to really invest in any one of the kids - so fewer activities, fewer holidays, less clothes etc. And that women fought for years not to have to have so many kids because it is bloody hard.
Anonymous wrote:kids)?
Anonymous wrote:Tell them they are selfish and willfully clueless because overpopulation is the single most important contributor to environmental collapse. Including that favorite hashtag of GenZ, climate change.
I would also add that they’d not Golden Retrievers so why are they intending to breed as if they were kennel dogs?
Don’t believe me? Try this: what would you say to another adult who told you their plan was to acquire 4-6 Golden Retrievers in the next few years? And thereafter always live in a household with six large dogs? Not as a business but just a home with 4-6 dogs cause you just always wanted a lot of dogs?