Anonymous wrote:Harvard's okay if you like old buildings and cold weather but all the savvy DCUM families send their kids to Clemson and Auburn nowadays.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a super powerful brand, particularly its graduate schools and programs of study. Nothing I’ve heard about the undergrad experience ( 2nd hand) leads me to think it is an amazing college experience. Lots if TA led classes rather than professors, meh social life, super competitive environment full of boasty types. But for someone interested in the brand there’s nothing better.
Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
Anonymous wrote:Princeton is the overrated one (helped a lot over the last decade by USNWR). It really is HS and everyone else right now (many others are great but just not quite there).
Anonymous wrote:It’s a super powerful brand, particularly its graduate schools and programs of study. Nothing I’ve heard about the undergrad experience ( 2nd hand) leads me to think it is an amazing college experience. Lots if TA led classes rather than professors, meh social life, super competitive environment full of boasty types. But for someone interested in the brand there’s nothing better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.
Administrators are correct that Harvard doesn't prioritize undergraduates, though.
Elon administrators are not acting as boosters. The list is generated by peer institutions. Not sure why a peer institution would boost another school.
Oh for sure. But I think the list is presented as a ranking of excellence in undergraduate teaching or something along those lines. I’m not convinced that a bunch of booster-y administrators are going to be a reliable source to tell us where the best undergraduate education can be found. no disrespect meant to Elon, I hear it’s a lovely place, but number one for undergraduate education in the country??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.
Administrators are correct that Harvard doesn't prioritize undergraduates, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you value. If you value attention to undergraduate education, it might be over-rated. According to USNews, which has a separate rating for best undergraduate teaching at national universities, it's tied for #18, with Miami University (Ohio). Close to this area, it's quite possible your student would get better teaching at William & Mary (tied for #7) or UMBC (tied for #9).
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
(They have a similar ranking for liberal arts colleges: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching)
I was trying to figure out how Elon could be at the tippy top of this list. Then I noticed that it’s generated by administrators voting on the degree to which a college prioritizes undergrads or something along those lines. I’m no Harvard booster, but I would consider this list fairly useless.