Anonymous wrote:Our neighbor says that at their top private, Lower School used Calkins’ Writers Workshop in Lower School. LS teachers were told not to correct grammar or spelling, per the Writers Workshop teacher’s guides, so little kids could be creative and love to write.
Now that their kids are in Middle School (at the same private), the teachers are scrambling to undo all the bad habits in grammar & spelling taught by using Calkins WW in the previous grades.
It seems silly to teach bad habits in LS and make the MS faculty repair avoidable damage. Checking websites, it seems many “top” privates are doing this sequence, not just our neighbor’s school.
It would sure be nice if people with connections to private school board members would inform those boards about all the Calkins-created issues - with reading, writing, spelling, and grammar.
Anonymous wrote:She should be banned from the field of education and forced to pay back every school district she fleeced (and the families of all the kids who needed private reading tutoring). She is a fraud and has damaged a generation (or two) of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that while her reading theories are wrong, the writing curriculum has been found to be helpful.
I wonder if unlike reading, different students do better with different writing curricula. It seems like there are a lot of different writing curricula that would work well.
But the main problem with writing instruction IMO is that students don’t get enough practice and feedback. I became a good writer because I had a great high school teacher who assigned some sort of writing assignment each week and ripped each assignment to shreds. I think that steady writing with in-depth feedback is more important than anything else.
If teachers aren’t allowed to correct spelling or grammar, there’s not enough feedback being given to improve their skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hochman method is better.
+1 OP for more info, read The Writing Revolution by Hochman and Wexler, The Writing Rope by Joan Sedita, and anything from William van Cleave. These authors take an explicit and systematic approach to writing. Lucy's writer's workshop, like her reading program, is based on the adult writer's workshop model rather than on sound pedagogy from good evidence and research.
Anonymous wrote:I have heard that while her reading theories are wrong, the writing curriculum has been found to be helpful.
I wonder if unlike reading, different students do better with different writing curricula. It seems like there are a lot of different writing curricula that would work well.
But the main problem with writing instruction IMO is that students don’t get enough practice and feedback. I became a good writer because I had a great high school teacher who assigned some sort of writing assignment each week and ripped each assignment to shreds. I think that steady writing with in-depth feedback is more important than anything else.
Anonymous wrote:We asked our DC’s teacher why his mistakes were not being corrected (on DC’s writing samples that came home). We were told she is not ALLOWED o correct mistakes because Writers Workshop method is about thinking great thoughts. We then were encouraged, in a much softer voice so others would not hear, o correct them at home so our DC could learn the proper spelling and grammar.
Sigh. And this Writers Workshop is in lower elementary for probably 8 of the top 10 privtes in Metro DC, as well as in many public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Hochman method is better.