Anonymous wrote:I’m willing to buy some things. I also try to give them advice on mixing and matching stuff.
I’ll be really honest - I don’t buy cheap shoes, so the shoes you listed wouldn’t phase me. My kids know most of what I buy will be on sale. As an example, the classic Doc Martens are $100 and their Chelsea boots are $96. That’s pretty much how much decent shoes cost in 2023. So I’d buy the Dunks and the Chelsea boots, and she’d have to fill in any gaps (or whatever). A big BUT here - my kids are not hard on shoes and wear them at least 6 months. They are still wearing the sneakers I bought in August.
I agree that she needs to start to understand what she REALLY needs. Is it the shoes? The purse? A really cool jacket?
She also needs to understand expensive jeans (or whatever) means one pair instead of 3 or 4. My middle schooler got a Nike Tech suit for his birthday. So he gets one outfit instead of 4.
Anonymous wrote:I would do what you can to get some of that stuff. Not all of it of course but a few choice items. It’s important to feel like you fit in at that age.
Anonymous wrote:This exactly. If your child suffers from low self-esteem, the brand names won’t do a thing to help them feel accepted. All kids want to look good and fit in at some point but buying the “right” things isn’t going to be a magic bullet and as parents we need to teach our children to value themselves more than that. If you can afford the nice things, there is no reason to withhold them but be clear that a person is much more than the clothes they wear or these trends will be quickly discarded as they search for the next intangible to boost their self-worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the reasons we moved out of the DMV. The importance placed on superficiality rather than substance didn't align with our ethics. We moved to a major city, and while yes some kids have dunks, kids also praise other kids for their creativity in fashion choices, and nobody teases anyone for anything that could be related to being poor. Our kids can buy fancy things with babysitting (or other job) money - one got a Kate Spade purse she'd wanted for almost a year.
One of the reasons? I really hope it was reason number 982634512490, because otherwise you're painting an entire region with a very broad, and ignorant brush... We live in a wealthy district in the DC area and no kids I know are how you and OP describe. We've lived here 23 years.
Lol, yes, there were a lot of other reasons. But Dh and I both noticed how much people, both kids and adults, are into status symbols in every way - clothes, shoes, cars, bags, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the reasons we moved out of the DMV. The importance placed on superficiality rather than substance didn't align with our ethics. We moved to a major city, and while yes some kids have dunks, kids also praise other kids for their creativity in fashion choices, and nobody teases anyone for anything that could be related to being poor. Our kids can buy fancy things with babysitting (or other job) money - one got a Kate Spade purse she'd wanted for almost a year.
One of the reasons? I really hope it was reason number 982634512490, because otherwise you're painting an entire region with a very broad, and ignorant brush... We live in a wealthy district in the DC area and no kids I know are how you and OP describe. We've lived here 23 years.
I don't recall being teased too much about my clothes, but there is certainly an element of envy when you are missing out on the shared fads of your peers.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the reasons we moved out of the DMV. The importance placed on superficiality rather than substance didn't align with our ethics. We moved to a major city, and while yes some kids have dunks, kids also praise other kids for their creativity in fashion choices, and nobody teases anyone for anything that could be related to being poor. Our kids can buy fancy things with babysitting (or other job) money - one got a Kate Spade purse she'd wanted for almost a year.