Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, being a top biller doesn’t matter. What matters is how much he generates in billables/collections, not just for his own work but also for work others do for his clients. The most valuable partners don’t bill a whole lot of their own time, but generate a ton of billable time by others.
Second, there’s no way to know what this means without knowing whether it’s isolated to him/his practice, or is a first-wide equity restructuring.
This guy gets it. It's not about the hours he bills, it's about how much he originates. Being a high biller as a partner is economically the same as a high billing associate.
Anonymous wrote:First, being a top biller doesn’t matter. What matters is how much he generates in billables/collections, not just for his own work but also for work others do for his clients. The most valuable partners don’t bill a whole lot of their own time, but generate a ton of billable time by others.
Second, there’s no way to know what this means without knowing whether it’s isolated to him/his practice, or is a first-wide equity restructuring.
Anonymous wrote:Op - he’s in a very niche practice group and considered a star in his field. Unfortunately it’s not a practice group that makes a ton of money for any firm but he did collect well (95% I think last year). He works with a lot of different clients including his own and those he shares with partners in other practice areas. He does a ton of BD and markets himself a lot.
He’s involved in very important aspects of the firm (thinking hiring, pro Bono, diversity) in additional to billing a lot.
Yes, we have saved, and we will be ok. He asked if he was being softly pushed out and was told no, that this was simply an across the board reduction. His closest partner in his group was also down 25%.
Anonymous wrote:Op - he’s in a very niche practice group and considered a star in his field. Unfortunately it’s not a practice group that makes a ton of money for any firm but he did collect well (95% I think last year). He works with a lot of different clients including his own and those he shares with partners in other practice areas. He does a ton of BD and markets himself a lot.
He’s involved in very important aspects of the firm (thinking hiring, pro Bono, diversity) in additional to billing a lot.
Yes, we have saved, and we will be ok. He asked if he was being softly pushed out and was told no, that this was simply an across the board reduction. His closest partner in his group was also down 25%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op - he’s in a very niche practice group and considered a star in his field. Unfortunately it’s not a practice group that makes a ton of money for any firm but he did collect well (95% I think last year). He works with a lot of different clients including his own and those he shares with partners in other practice areas. He does a ton of BD and markets himself a lot.
He’s involved in very important aspects of the firm (thinking hiring, pro Bono, diversity) in additional to billing a lot.
Yes, we have saved, and we will be ok. He asked if he was being softly pushed out and was told no, that this was simply an across the board reduction. His closest partner in his group was also down 25%.
In that case he should look around. Has he considered teaching at Georgetown/GW/AU as an adjunct? It's not much money, but it may help him feel better and those schools love being able to offer niche classes tought by well regarded practitioners
Anonymous wrote:Op - he’s in a very niche practice group and considered a star in his field. Unfortunately it’s not a practice group that makes a ton of money for any firm but he did collect well (95% I think last year). He works with a lot of different clients including his own and those he shares with partners in other practice areas. He does a ton of BD and markets himself a lot.
He’s involved in very important aspects of the firm (thinking hiring, pro Bono, diversity) in additional to billing a lot.
Yes, we have saved, and we will be ok. He asked if he was being softly pushed out and was told no, that this was simply an across the board reduction. His closest partner in his group was also down 25%.
Anonymous wrote:I think being moved down a level in partnership (is he a nonequity partner now?) is a big red flag. It sounds like the firm is having continuing financial issues. He should start looking elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Op - he’s in a very niche practice group and considered a star in his field. Unfortunately it’s not a practice group that makes a ton of money for any firm but he did collect well (95% I think last year). He works with a lot of different clients including his own and those he shares with partners in other practice areas. He does a ton of BD and markets himself a lot.
He’s involved in very important aspects of the firm (thinking hiring, pro Bono, diversity) in additional to billing a lot.
Yes, we have saved, and we will be ok. He asked if he was being softly pushed out and was told no, that this was simply an across the board reduction. His closest partner in his group was also down 25%.
Anonymous wrote:You shouldn't have been spending to the limit of your income in the first place; counting on a bonus is always risky. If the firm profits went down by 20 percent, then partner comp will go down, because that's what it means to be a partner. (It also means that you need to bring in your own business, and that you need to be sure that your billables are also collectible.) You don't say whether most other partners' comp was reduced by about the same amount, or whether your husband was an outlier. If it's the latter, they are nudging him out the door.