Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the quick replies. We’ll she see if she has the cajones to communicate this directly to my FIL rather than telling it to DH, but then caveating “but don’t tell FIL.”
Anonymous wrote:At 85 and 89 the whole thing is a house of cards OP. And it's a wakeup call for everyone involved. So there is some good news here (or at least important information you're getting):
- the current injury is just a broken arm. It could be a lot worse.
- your FIL is lucid and able to make decisions for himself
- your FIL is currently in a safe, well supervised setting
- your FIL has a home of his own
- his partner has clear boundaries - she's telling you her limits, not dodging the conversation
- you can plan for next steps, longer term, etc... and your FIL can be part of that planning. You're not in an imminently life threatening crisis. He can also talk directly w/ his partner - they are adults and you can expect them to take some responsibility for communicating w/ each other (of course, presuming cognitive capabilities).
The bad news is that the partner is not accepting responsibility, but the reality is that even if she were willing to support someone else's convalescence, an 85 year old woman cannot be expected to be a safe, long-term solution for caregiving. No matter the relationship between them or the individual desires to help (or not).
Safety first. And expecting an 85 year old woman to care for an 89 year old man, is not a great plan. Regardless of what anyone does or does not want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If roles were reversed I am sure he would be there for her.
Maybe. Maybe not. This lady is 85 and while you say your FIL has been there for her in somewhat similar circumstances, for one I'm sure he's probably larger than she is. My mother's second husband was much older and while she did nurse him til the end, even in her late 60s it was very, very physically difficult for her to deal with him once he really began to fail simply due to his size. And that's without accounting for the emotional strain.
I'm with others who say be glad they have had so many good years together AND kept their accounts separate, which they undoubtedly did at least in part because they wanted to respect each other's kids' inheritances. Two people in their late 80s or 90s can't really be expected to take care of each other the way younger people can, that's just the reality of the situation.
Anonymous wrote:My FIL, 89, has been in a committed long term relationship with a woman his age for close to twenty years. They have kept their finances separate and maintain separate homes in the same town, splitting between both, although recently FIL has been staying primarily at her place and going to his place every day as if it’s an office. They have had an active life together: travel, book clubs, concerts, visits and holidays with children from both families. She additionally is a dedicated musician, has been deeply involved as a board member in a local organization. They are both quite cerebral and opinionated, and all the children agree that they have been really good for each other over the years. Her health has been generally good for her 85+ age, and FIL nursed her through hip and knee replacements. He has prostate cancer (under treatment) and finally got hearing aids.
Well a week ago FIL slipped on some ice and badly broke his arm, landing in the hospital. DH flew across the country to be with his father. FIL fully expects to go back to her home, where they’ve primarily been living, when he’s released, but his partner has told my husband that she doesn’t want him to return there; she wants him to convalesce at his place. When pressed, she said their relationship is based on a certain amount of distance and independence between them and she doesn’t want that to change. I get it, they’re not married, but I’m kind of gobsmacked. If roles were reversed I am sure he would be there for her.
Has anyone been in a similar situation? How did it play out? They live in a smallish city out West. It’s not the boonies, but it’s also not DC, and neither has children who live locally.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the quick replies. We’ll she see if she has the cajones to communicate this directly to my FIL rather than telling it to DH, but then caveating “but don’t tell FIL.”
She does not want to be his caretaker. She views that as your job. She is seeking companionship but will not assume responsibility for him when he declines. It was good while it lasted.
Anonymous wrote:If roles were reversed I am sure he would be there for her.