Anonymous wrote:Potomac has the Scotland neighborhood off of Seven Locks Road.
They also had some affordable housing multifamily homes in Avenel.
Anonymous wrote:I'm talking about apartments, rent controlled and affordable housing needs to be a priority in that town
Anonymous wrote:I guess I don't really understand all of the drama surrounding affordable housing. I would love to live in San Diego or Manhattan, but I can't afford it. So I ended up living somewhere that is more affordable. And despite their best efforts to increase multi family housing, these areas remain very expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Planning said we can add transit and buses in the River Road corridor. That’s why the part inside the beltway is a growth corridor in Thrive. It was supposed to be a growth outside the beltway into Potomac too but Friedson made them take it out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Planning said we can add transit and buses in the River Road corridor. That’s why the part inside the beltway is a growth corridor in Thrive. It was supposed to be a growth outside the beltway into Potomac too but Friedson made them take it out.
Which parts of Potomac are inside the Beltway?
The Palasides
Nice joke but I’m pretty sure it’s actually Kent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Planning said we can add transit and buses in the River Road corridor. That’s why the part inside the beltway is a growth corridor in Thrive. It was supposed to be a growth outside the beltway into Potomac too but Friedson made them take it out.
Which parts of Potomac are inside the Beltway?
The Palasides
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you the same poster in the Clifton thread calling for affordable multi family housing?
I think the interchanges poster has found a new pet hobby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Planning said we can add transit and buses in the River Road corridor. That’s why the part inside the beltway is a growth corridor in Thrive. It was supposed to be a growth outside the beltway into Potomac too but Friedson made them take it out.
Which parts of Potomac are inside the Beltway?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Planning said we can add transit and buses in the River Road corridor. That’s why the part inside the beltway is a growth corridor in Thrive. It was supposed to be a growth outside the beltway into Potomac too but Friedson made them take it out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, Curious why you say that. Potomac is a bit rural and not near public transportation or much of anything else for that matter.
There’s no reason we can’t build transit there or add bus routes.
There is a reason why we cannot do these things, it is called planning. These things are not in the short or long-term transportation plans for Potomac. Furthermore, to the OPs first point, the county took a historic look at housing and land use to produce a new general plan called Thrive 2050 that had the organizing principal of “compact growth”. Developing Potomac contradicts that principal and as a result, River Rd north of the Beltway to Potomac was specifically and unanimously determined to not be a “growth corridor” for housing densification.
Under a bridge where all trolls live.Anonymous wrote:Where do you live OP?