Anonymous wrote:They are different things. Deferrals are automatically reconsidered in the RD round, which may result in an admit. Waitlists are not reconsidered during RD, but may get an admit if accepted students from all rounds are insufficient to fill the class. If you want to attend the school, a deferral is better.
Anonymous wrote:Deferred is a fake term created for top universities to make qualified applicant that they have no intention of making an offer to feel good.
It means your grades make you qualified but no.
Waitlisted means we want you but don’t have room, if room opens up you will get an offer.
Anonymous wrote:Neither. Either way, you are placed on hold until a miracle happens.
Anonymous wrote:I thought deferred was for ED/EA and WL was for RD. Does anyone get waitlisted from ED/EA?
Anonymous wrote:There’s stats out there that tell exact school and their percent admit from waitlist. FWIW my kid was deferred and rejected from Fordham, and deferred, then waitlisted, then admitted at Pitt. Admitted at Pitt on May 2.
Anonymous wrote:College admissions is a wicked game.
If your highly qualified kid gets deferred during EA, and the school is their first choice, then apply ED2. There’s a good chance your kid will get admitted.
The colleges think you’ll have a better offer and reject them— oftentimes they are protecting yield.
Think of the Cheap Trick song… I want you to want me.
Anonymous wrote:There’s stats out there that tell exact school and their percent admit from waitlist. FWIW my kid was deferred and rejected from Fordham, and deferred, then waitlisted, then admitted at Pitt. Admitted at Pitt on May 2.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone encountered "preferred waitlist" at a school which also "waitlists" some applicants ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought deferred was for ED/EA and WL was for RD. Does anyone get waitlisted from ED/EA?
Yes from EA