Anonymous wrote:My kid scored 1590 on the first try. Also NMS We love that there are many candidates who go TO. It does not harm us or them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that starting with this year’s ED, kids with test scores are going to start winning more seats, particularly at selective schools.
That has been the case for the past years as well. If you have two candidates and one submits a good score and one is test optional, reason suggests the first one gets the slot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that starting with this year’s ED, kids with test scores are going to start winning more seats, particularly at selective schools.
That is already the case, one would be hard pressed to find a T20 school that accepted 40 percent or more students test optional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am seeing recommendations that you should only submit your score if you are at or above the mean for the college.
The reason is that colleges want to look good in national stats, so they don't want students who will lower their numbers.
However, not every student will be at exactly the mean, so this means the average for that college will go up.
The next year, only students who score at or higher than that new higher average will be reporting their scores, producing a still higher average.
Pretty soon only 1600s will be reporting their scores. The colleges will be getting no information except for this small group.
How about if they are going to be test optional, the College Board reports the average for each college's acceptances and enrolled students in the aggregate?
That way you at least don't have this vicious cycle.
My conclusion from this set of facts is that the current advice to applicants is wrong-- you submit scores if you are in the upper half of their SAT averages a couple of years ago.
Anonymous wrote:If you want to give your kid their best shot, have them prep for the test (I'm not saying to get a private tutor, but have them study using Khan Academy and take a lot of practice tests). If they get a high score, submit it. If they don't, consider test optional. But why would you cut off their possibility of getting a high score?
These tests get a bad rap. My junior has been studying (as described above) and her math skills have improved. These ideas that test prep is all useless tricks is hogwash. Prepping for the test improves your basic math and reading/grammar skills. Which is presumably a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being dramatic. Lots of schools have been test option for 10+ years and are doing fine.
Yes, but most kids used to submit scores. That’s now changing and causing problems for admissions officers, like too many applicants and an inability to fairly judge student records. Tests are coming back.
Is that why Williams just extended three more years and Harvard is TO through 2030?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being dramatic. Lots of schools have been test option for 10+ years and are doing fine.
Yes, but most kids used to submit scores. That’s now changing and causing problems for admissions officers, like too many applicants and an inability to fairly judge student records. Tests are coming back.
AOs know how to do their jobs. We're going on year 3 of mass TO.
You’re right, and AO’s at selective schools are asking for the tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being dramatic. Lots of schools have been test option for 10+ years and are doing fine.
Yes, but most kids used to submit scores. That’s now changing and causing problems for admissions officers, like too many applicants and an inability to fairly judge student records. Tests are coming back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am seeing recommendations that you should only submit your score if you are at or above the mean for the college.
The reason is that colleges want to look good in national stats, so they don't want students who will lower their numbers.
However, not every student will be at exactly the mean, so this means the average for that college will go up.
The next year, only students who score at or higher than that new higher average will be reporting their scores, producing a still higher average.
Pretty soon only 1600s will be reporting their scores. The colleges will be getting no information except for this small group.
How about if they are going to be test optional, the College Board reports the average for each college's acceptances and enrolled students in the aggregate?
That way you at least don't have this vicious cycle.
My conclusion from this set of facts is that the current advice to applicants is wrong-- you submit scores if you are in the upper half of their SAT averages a couple of years ago.
Anonymous wrote:I am seeing recommendations that you should only submit your score if you are at or above the mean for the college.
The reason is that colleges want to look good in national stats, so they don't want students who will lower their numbers.
However, not every student will be at exactly the mean, so this means the average for that college will go up.
The next year, only students who score at or higher than that new higher average will be reporting their scores, producing a still higher average.
Pretty soon only 1600s will be reporting their scores. The colleges will be getting no information except for this small group.
How about if they are going to be test optional, the College Board reports the average for each college's acceptances and enrolled students in the aggregate?
That way you at least don't have this vicious cycle.
Anonymous wrote:I am seeing recommendations that you should only submit your score if you are at or above the mean for the college.
The reason is that colleges want to look good in national stats, so they don't want students who will lower their numbers.
However, not every student will be at exactly the mean, so this means the average for that college will go up.
The next year, only students who score at or higher than that new higher average will be reporting their scores, producing a still higher average.
Pretty soon only 1600s will be reporting their scores. The colleges will be getting no information except for this small group.
How about if they are going to be test optional, the College Board reports the average for each college's acceptances and enrolled students in the aggregate?
That way you at least don't have this vicious cycle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being dramatic. Lots of schools have been test option for 10+ years and are doing fine.
Yes, but most kids used to submit scores. That’s now changing and causing problems for admissions officers, like too many applicants and an inability to fairly judge student records. Tests are coming back.
AOs know how to do their jobs. We're going on year 3 of mass TO.