Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Interesting idea. I like that.
Should you also ask if you hired tutors and if so when and how long.
Also ask if you hired college admission consultant?
Also ask who reviewed you essays?
Sure, why not?
Because people lie and the answers can't be verified.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
How does this help in urban areas?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Interesting idea. I like that.
Should you also ask if you hired tutors and if so when and how long.
Also ask if you hired college admission consultant?
Also ask who reviewed you essays?
Sure, why not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Interesting idea. I like that.
Should you also ask if you hired tutors and if so when and how long.
Also ask if you hired college admission consultant?
Also ask who reviewed you essays?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Interesting idea. I like that.
Should you also ask if you hired tutors and if so when and how long.
Also ask if you hired college admission consultant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Interesting idea. I like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
First gen college here, as an aside.
But I have a serious question for the lawyers on the board, why can’t admissions officers do what the Georgetown Dean claims: adjust score thresholds for zip codes/profiles? (He is quoted in the latest Selingo article as saying a 1200 from an underprivileged zip code should be viewed differ than a 1200 from a kid with lots of resources). Aren’t there studies out there on upward mobility that could prove certain profiles, including test scores below the the college range but above the range for a kid’s particular high school, often have a high rate of success in college, and are therefore worth admitting? Seems like you wouldn’t have to get into questions about race but rather opportunity.
Couldn't you also ask kids on an application if they enrolled in a prep class? Georgetown already asks to see all scores.
It seems to me more info is good rather than bad.
Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
Anonymous wrote:MIT, Georgia Tech, Purdue, serious schools are coming back to test required.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of the previous posters on this thread are NOT privileged? Let me guess: none.
Please define "privileged?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, Georgia Tech, Purdue, serious schools are coming back to test required.
unfortunately In the us, serious schools aren’t respected in society
What a silly comment. People are falling all over themselves to get into top schools. How can you say the US does not respect Serious schools? MIT, Stanford, CalTech not serious enough for you?
Stanford is not not the same as these other ones first of all - it has way more in common with wokeness like hyp
Second, it’s true — mit, gt, Purdue are schools that educate people who make society work and tick but not necessarily the social movers and shakers like hyps
It feels like Nescacs, duke, vandy, other southern schools are more sought after and respected
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MIT, Georgia Tech, Purdue, serious schools are coming back to test required.
unfortunately In the us, serious schools aren’t respected in society
What a silly comment. People are falling all over themselves to get into top schools. How can you say the US does not respect Serious schools? MIT, Stanford, CalTech not serious enough for you?