Anonymous wrote:People who are doing well are more likely to be proud of that and then comment on questions about money/wealth. People who are in debt or haven't had time to save a lot are less likely to post about their situation.
Anonymous wrote:age matters - a lot easier to have 1 mil @50 than @35
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have over 1 million in our combined retirement accounts. We are in our early forties. Then another 500k or so in home equity. We are definitely not wealthy compared to people in our friend group or neighborhood though so I would say that most people in this area have a minimum of 1mil - especially with 2 working adults. We are a single earner family of 3
Well your retirement accounts aren't liquid if you are in your 40s, so according to the posters here, you can't count those. Also can't your home equity. So you are poor.
Anonymous wrote:We have over 1 million in our combined retirement accounts. We are in our early forties. Then another 500k or so in home equity. We are definitely not wealthy compared to people in our friend group or neighborhood though so I would say that most people in this area have a minimum of 1mil - especially with 2 working adults. We are a single earner family of 3
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of it comes from their home.
If you were to take the home out of their 'net worth', most of the posters are not really millionaires.
But it is part of their net worth. If you took away Jeff Bezos' Amazon stock, he would not be a centibillionaire.
Stocks are more liquid than someone’s home residence.
Stocks > home.
You’re not very bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of it comes from their home.
If you were to take the home out of their 'net worth', most of the posters are not really millionaires.
But it is part of their net worth. If you took away Jeff Bezos' Amazon stock, he would not be a centibillionaire.
Anonymous wrote:I’m wealthy