Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I review undergrad apps at my university. I do not take applicants seriously that don't show a sincere enthusiasm for a foreign language. It doesn't disqualify you, but I'd much rather admit a student who has excelled in a foreign language than one who merely checked off a box
This seems like an odd take. Isn't the important thing to identify candidates that have sincere enthusiasm for any one of a myriad of subjects? Why must they have sincere enthusiasm for a foreign language for you to find them interesting? How about a student who is passionate about philosophy or physics or ancient history? Are they less interesting to you than one who possesses a sincere enthusiasm for a foreign language?
I speak as a parent of a kid with genuine profound curiosity across several subjects, including math, philosophy, political science, and physics. Yet for some reason he finds the study of foreign language pretty dull. Still, he took 4 years of it, concluding in 10th grade. And he excelled in it. So I find your comment that you prefer a student who "excelled" in foreign language vs one who "merely checked off a box" interesting. It wasn't one vs the other for him. He did excel, but he absolutely checked a box because there's a multitude of other subjects he would rather pursue (and does now). And that didn't impede his college admissions in the least. He was admitted to several highly selective colleges. While I'll never know why they chose him, I presume his deep intellectual curiosity was a key reason, rather than an arbitrary belief that intellectual curiosity must be in a foreign language to be deemed a qualified candidate.
I should be clear that I'm an advocate for the study of foreign languages. My point is only that we are all wired differently and I think it would be an odd requirement that individuals must have a "sincere enthusiasm" for a foreign language to be admissable. That's quite different than a solid exposure and some mastery of a foreign language, which strikes me as a more logical requirement.
Anonymous wrote:I review undergrad apps at my university. I do not take applicants seriously that don't show a sincere enthusiasm for a foreign language. It doesn't disqualify you, but I'd much rather admit a student who has excelled in a foreign language than one who merely checked off a box
Anonymous wrote:I review undergrad apps at my university. I do not take applicants seriously that don't show a sincere enthusiasm for a foreign language. It doesn't disqualify you, but I'd much rather admit a student who has excelled in a foreign language than one who merely checked off a box
Anonymous wrote:I always thought 2 years of foreign language was required but I am looking at my kid’s high school course paperwork and it said 2 Language OR advance technology OR career development.
Anonymous wrote:Colleges want to see 2+ years of languages taken IN HIGH SCHOOL. You wouldn’t believe the number of abusive parents who force their 11-year-old to take a language in 6th grade because they unwisely believe that will somehow give them a leg-up on college admissions. Hint: it won’t. Unless your middle schooler has the maturity and the work ethic of a 9th grader, there is NO REASON to take a language in middle school.
Anonymous wrote:I could be mistaken, but doesn't MCPS require at least two years of foreign language in high school? FWIW, my current college freshman was advised by his counselor to take at least 3 years of language in high school because most colleges want to see at least that much even though MCPS only requires 2 years.
OP, I feel your pain. My younger DC loathes foreign language, so I know I will be facing a similar situation too. Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Colleges want to see 2+ years of languages taken IN HIGH SCHOOL. You wouldn’t believe the number of abusive parents who force their 11-year-old to take a language in 6th grade because they unwisely believe that will somehow give them a leg-up on college admissions. Hint: it won’t. Unless your middle schooler has the maturity and the work ethic of a 9th grader, there is NO REASON to take a language in middle school.
Anonymous wrote:What would she replace it with? If she is headed to engineering and can replace FL with another math class, that might be all right.