Anonymous wrote:I love Florence. Milan is boring.
Anonymous wrote:aAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gosh, I would do Florence and drop Venice. I hate Venice. It is so overrun as a tourist trap. Or go to Venice for 1 day and then spend the rest of your time in Rome.
This
I feel they are both overrun, but Venice almost takes on a Disney esque type of feel. Going in April, because wife has never been. I have been 15-20 times and could really go without it.
Will you people please get over yourselves? You need to see Venice in your lifetime. Forget what it's become- focus on the amazing history of the place for god sakes. There is no other place in the world like it.
aAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gosh, I would do Florence and drop Venice. I hate Venice. It is so overrun as a tourist trap. Or go to Venice for 1 day and then spend the rest of your time in Rome.
This
I feel they are both overrun, but Venice almost takes on a Disney esque type of feel. Going in April, because wife has never been. I have been 15-20 times and could really go without it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gosh, I would do Florence and drop Venice. I hate Venice. It is so overrun as a tourist trap. Or go to Venice for 1 day and then spend the rest of your time in Rome.
OP, here again. I’ve heard mixed things about Venice too. We’re going in the spring so hopefully Venice isn’t too bad. Since it’s our first time to Italy, maybe it will all be fascinating?
We are flying in and out of Milan. I would probably be fine with staying in Milan/Bergamo the whole time and maybe going to Lake Como and into the mountains. If anybody has Northern Italy recs, please share.
Anonymous wrote:Here we go again with the “overrun with tourists” trope.
I love Italy.
I would not stay in Naples and do day trips as Naples is my least favorite and I thought one day was plenty..