Anonymous wrote:Boomers pushing out millennials again

Maybe her constituents would actually like a public servant that gets laws passed for their benefit, as opposed to someone who seems to spend most of their time on social media owning the libs.

Boomers pushing out millennials again

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much the salacious muckrakers story impacted this …

What's good for the goose is good for the gander (?) Anyway she sucks and needs to go away.

Anonymous wrote:Yes--hope so OP! Praying for a miracle.

Yes! OnlyFans needs a new model.

Very high probability of Boebert loss!!

The Boebert-Frisch race is tied 50-50% but the bulk of ballots yet to be counted, per AP, are in Pitkin County (80% counted, currently Frisch +58, not a typo), Pueblo County (91.6% counted, currently Frisch +9.6), and Garfield County (90% counted, currently Frisch +13.6).

the GOP stronghold of Mesa County only has 300 uncounted ballots. The only county clearly in the Boebert column that has a significant percentage of uncounted ballots is tiny Otero County (76.5% counted, currently Boebert +14.4).

In Pueblo County alone, there are 6,000 uncounted ballots. Those ballots may not be counted tonight as election workers are given time to eat and rest.

Military/overseas ballots will be accepted and signature issues can be cured until Nov 16. There will be an automatic recount under state law if the margin of victory is less than 0.5% of the winner's total votes. Any campaign may pay for a recount outside that margin.

Yes--hope so OP! Praying for a miracle.

Anonymous wrote:Where are these numbers being reported? NYT isn’t updating regularly.

I'm checking NPR, MSNBC and AP to get an idea of the numbers. NPR has a great tabular format to watch the results, but updates less frequently than the others. MSNBC is good if you want to see the county-by-county breakdowns.

Anonymous wrote:This one will go to a recount, will take a few weeks to play out. Her opponent ran a fantastic race.

An automatic recount. Colorado election law says that an automatic recount is triggered by any result within 0.05%. That means about 1600 votes. Since the current difference is less than 100, it is unlikely that the vote difference is going to rise by 1500 votes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much the salacious muckrakers story impacted this …

what story?

Here is the thread: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1064489.page

As far as I can tell:
A Dem PAC "American Muckrakers" alleged that Lauren worked as an escort and had multiple abortions and provided specific dates, and posted a photo of an escort they claimed was Lauren.
Lauren said these claims were fake news and that she was going to sue the muckrakers.
Lauren's supporters (and a few opponents) denounce the allegations as misogyny
Lauren's critics said that she would never file a lawsuit because it would open up to discovery would not be favorable to Lauren
American Muckrackers recanted the part of their story that alleged the escort photo was Lauren and said they had inaccurate dates for her abortions. They maintained the other parts of the story regarding abortions and escorting history were true.
American Muckrakers sues Lauren for libel/defamation over her comments about them in the media.
As of today, Lauren has not sued the Muckrakers over the initial escorting/abortion allegations.

This one will go to a recount, will take a few weeks to play out. Her opponent ran a fantastic race.

Where are these numbers being reported? NYT isn’t updating regularly.

Those numbers are amazing!

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much the salacious muckrakers story impacted this …

what story?