Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Though not as passionate as OP, I can kind of see were he/she is coming from. Those stats are combining the assets of two people and comparing it to the assets of one person. The married couple will obviously have significantly higher expenses and there is about a 50% chance that your assets will be cut in half if/when you divorce. The haters on this thread probably like the stat because they feel more accomplished than they actually are.
Yes, two people have higher expenses than one, but not twice as high because there’s only one household to maintain. Dividing the asssets in half doesn’t give a clear picture of the financial health of the family.
Anonymous wrote:Though not as passionate as OP, I can kind of see were he/she is coming from. Those stats are combining the assets of two people and comparing it to the assets of one person. The married couple will obviously have significantly higher expenses and there is about a 50% chance that your assets will be cut in half if/when you divorce. The haters on this thread probably like the stat because they feel more accomplished than they actually are.
Anonymous wrote:I never understood why people do this. While it’s not quite as dumb as my saying, “Elon Musk and I together are billionaires!“, it’s pretty close.
Just head on over to the relationship forum if you don’t believe that marriages end. And even if you do stay together, marriage requires a lot of compromise and sacrifice. If you consider net worth as a measure of financial freedom, the drawbacks of marriage really eliminate a lot of that “freedom.“
Moreover, if two 35-year-olds each have $500,000 saved, why do they suddenly become millionaires when they get married?? But it makes people feel better to say that they have a net worth of $1 million instead of $500,000, so I guess we’ll keep using this silly standard.
Anonymous wrote:I never understood why people do this. While it’s not quite as dumb as my saying, “Elon Musk and I together are billionaires!“, it’s pretty close.
Just head on over to the relationship forum if you don’t believe that marriages end. And even if you do stay together, marriage requires a lot of compromise and sacrifice. If you consider net worth as a measure of financial freedom, the drawbacks of marriage really eliminate a lot of that “freedom.“
Moreover, if two 35-year-olds each have $500,000 saved, why do they suddenly become millionaires when they get married?? But it makes people feel better to say that they have a net worth of $1 million instead of $500,000, so I guess we’ll keep using this silly standard.
Anonymous wrote:Dh and I aren’t divorcing. And if he dies I get his money.
Most people never mention net worth. It’s a hard thing to calculate. Everyone I know uses household income, which by definition means both incomes.