Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Not the house that was shot at. The ad talked about the Republican’s lake house, which wasn’t shot at. The house that was shot at was never mentioned.
Shooting occurred the day after the ad aired. Not hard to use public tax records
That’s a huge leap. It wasn’t the house. The ad was a simple campaign ad, not incitement against the house in the ad or any other house. The ad had nothing to do with the shooting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Not the house that was shot at. The ad talked about the Republican’s lake house, which wasn’t shot at. The house that was shot at was never mentioned.
Shooting occurred the day after the ad aired. Not hard to use public tax records
Anonymous wrote:Let's back up.
The shooting happened on October 18. A bullet coming from a heavily wooded area hit Harrigan's parents' house. Harrigan's kids were sleeping in the house at the time. Police and FBI are investigating. There was no announcement at the time this happened.
A week later, on October 25, Harrigan posted an open letter to his opponent, Jeff Jackson, complaining about a bunch of things, including the ad that showed his lake house. (Apparently there is a question as to whether Harrigan actually lives in the congressional district). Letter doesn't mention the shooting although he says he's received death threats and wears a "low-profile bulletproof vest."
Open letter:
When Harrigan's campaign finally told the media about the shooting this week (after the Pelosi attack and Biden's speech) they originally said it was Harrigan's own house, but they corrected that, saying it was a "typo."
https://www.carolinajournal.com/shooting-at-nc-14-gop-candidate-pat-harrigans-home-family-uninjured/
FBI has joined the investigation, but it hasn't been determined if the shooting was intentional or an accident.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's back up.
The shooting happened on October 18. A bullet coming from a heavily wooded area hit Harrigan's parents' house. Harrigan's kids were sleeping in the house at the time. Police and FBI are investigating. There was no announcement at the time this happened.
A week later, on October 25, Harrigan posted an open letter to his opponent, Jeff Jackson, complaining about a bunch of things, including the ad that showed his lake house. (Apparently there is a question as to whether Harrigan actually lives in the congressional district). Letter doesn't mention the shooting although he says he's received death threats and wears a "low-profile bulletproof vest."
Open letter:
When Harrigan's campaign finally told the media about the shooting this week (after the Pelosi attack and Biden's speech) they originally said it was Harrigan's own house, but they corrected that, saying it was a "typo."
https://www.carolinajournal.com/shooting-at-nc-14-gop-candidate-pat-harrigans-home-family-uninjured/
FBI has joined the investigation, but it hasn't been determined if the shooting was intentional or an accident.
Huh. So there is really more to THIS story than meets the eye.
Anonymous wrote:Let's back up.
The shooting happened on October 18. A bullet coming from a heavily wooded area hit Harrigan's parents' house. Harrigan's kids were sleeping in the house at the time. Police and FBI are investigating. There was no announcement at the time this happened.
A week later, on October 25, Harrigan posted an open letter to his opponent, Jeff Jackson, complaining about a bunch of things, including the ad that showed his lake house. (Apparently there is a question as to whether Harrigan actually lives in the congressional district). Letter doesn't mention the shooting although he says he's received death threats and wears a "low-profile bulletproof vest."
Open letter:
When Harrigan's campaign finally told the media about the shooting this week (after the Pelosi attack and Biden's speech) they originally said it was Harrigan's own house, but they corrected that, saying it was a "typo."
https://www.carolinajournal.com/shooting-at-nc-14-gop-candidate-pat-harrigans-home-family-uninjured/
FBI has joined the investigation, but it hasn't been determined if the shooting was intentional or an accident.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Not the house that was shot at. The ad talked about the Republican’s lake house, which wasn’t shot at. The house that was shot at was never mentioned.
Shooting occurred the day after the ad aired. Not hard to use public tax records
But that can be true for every candidate running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Not the house that was shot at. The ad talked about the Republican’s lake house, which wasn’t shot at. The house that was shot at was never mentioned.
Shooting occurred the day after the ad aired. Not hard to use public tax records
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Not the house that was shot at. The ad talked about the Republican’s lake house, which wasn’t shot at. The house that was shot at was never mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
I'm sure the ad included the footage of him/his house to prove some kind of point: that he is wealthy enough to own a lake house, taxes, etc. Obviously the GOP candidate had filmed this footage of himself because I can't imagine him sitting for his opponent's ad. Unless he surreptitiously filmed it, which would also be problematic. Without seeing the ad, it's hard to make a judgment call, but it was the right thing to do after making a bad judgment call.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is an ad of someone shooting a gun? Just why? Sounds awful.
Nowhere does it what there was guns shooting in the ad.
No it apparently had a photo of the guy’s house in it!