Anonymous wrote:Before the signs, of course the driver of a car would stop if a walker was in the cross walk... BUT the walker would not enter the crosswalk if they saw a car approaching... it's what your parents taught you, don't walk out in front of a moving car.
BUT now, people old enough to know better and the younger generation head directly into the cross walk, frequently without hesitation, in front of an on coming car. As a driver I have seen walkers 6-12 feet from the curb, head directly into the cross walk even though they see the oncoming car. Why would they trust that the incoming car would stop just because they now have the right of way ??? It's like they feel entitled to make the car stop.
Can we go back to crossing when traffic is clear ???
That's the advice our parents gave us.
Anonymous wrote:If I see someone on the curb ahead, I slow significantly. I actually hate it when people stop and wait for me to stop before even beginning to walk across the street. By slowing, I gave them plenty of time to get going, but half the time they wait until I am waving them across the street. It takes twice the time for both of us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before the signs, of course the driver of a car would stop if a walker was in the cross walk... BUT the walker would not enter the crosswalk if they saw a car approaching... it's what your parents taught you, don't walk out in front of a moving car.
BUT now, people old enough to know better and the younger generation head directly into the cross walk, frequently without hesitation, in front of an on coming car. As a driver I have seen walkers 6-12 feet from the curb, head directly into the cross walk even though they see the oncoming car. Why would they trust that the incoming car would stop just because they now have the right of way ??? It's like they feel entitled to make the car stop.
Can we go back to crossing when traffic is clear ???
That's the advice our parents gave us.
But they ARE entitled to make the car stop. That's the actual purpose of the crosswalk -- so that cars will stop and yield to pedestrians.
I think OP’s point is that they don’t even look which gives you zero margin for error. Technically they are supposed to make eye contact with the driver before they cross. The process is supposed to take long and be safe.
Anonymous wrote:Before the signs, of course the driver of a car would stop if a walker was in the cross walk... BUT the walker would not enter the crosswalk if they saw a car approaching... it's what your parents taught you, don't walk out in front of a moving car.
BUT now, people old enough to know better and the younger generation head directly into the cross walk, frequently without hesitation, in front of an on coming car. As a driver I have seen walkers 6-12 feet from the curb, head directly into the cross walk even though they see the oncoming car. Why would they trust that the incoming car would stop just because they now have the right of way ??? It's like they feel entitled to make the car stop.
Can we go back to crossing when traffic is clear ???
That's the advice our parents gave us.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not naive... I don't walk in front of a moving car... and I accelerate to a jog if I'm already in cross walk and see a car approaching... momma didn't raise an (entitled) dummy.
Anonymous wrote:There's a difference between _in_ and _entering_.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before the signs, of course the driver of a car would stop if a walker was in the cross walk... BUT the walker would not enter the crosswalk if they saw a car approaching... it's what your parents taught you, don't walk out in front of a moving car.
BUT now, people old enough to know better and the younger generation head directly into the cross walk, frequently without hesitation, in front of an on coming car. As a driver I have seen walkers 6-12 feet from the curb, head directly into the cross walk even though they see the oncoming car. Why would they trust that the incoming car would stop just because they now have the right of way ??? It's like they feel entitled to make the car stop.
Can we go back to crossing when traffic is clear ???
That's the advice our parents gave us.
But they ARE entitled to make the car stop. That's the actual purpose of the crosswalk -- so that cars will stop and yield to pedestrians.
Anonymous wrote:Before the signs, of course the driver of a car would stop if a walker was in the cross walk... BUT the walker would not enter the crosswalk if they saw a car approaching... it's what your parents taught you, don't walk out in front of a moving car.
BUT now, people old enough to know better and the younger generation head directly into the cross walk, frequently without hesitation, in front of an on coming car. As a driver I have seen walkers 6-12 feet from the curb, head directly into the cross walk even though they see the oncoming car. Why would they trust that the incoming car would stop just because they now have the right of way ??? It's like they feel entitled to make the car stop.
Can we go back to crossing when traffic is clear ???
That's the advice our parents gave us.