Anonymous wrote:It depends on how you define doing well. Soft bigotry of low expectations seems apt
Anonymous wrote:BCC is close in and doing much better.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is gross. You have a list of schools that are making demonstrated progress in closing the achievement gap, and people are comparing that to school performance in neighborhoods where the biggest at-risk problem is that Larla's Tesla might not come in time for her 16th birthday.
Anonymous wrote:Are you suggesting that there is serious moral hazard to recognizing progress? My child is at one of the recognized schools. The principal could point to gains the school has achieved over the past five years and easily get a job in a suburban school district with much higher academic performance. Same thing for many of the teachers. I don’t know that recognizing their hard work absolves the central office of anything or that it sends a signal that they have reached peak performance.
It’s also grating that any time schools with a sizeable at-risk population are recognized, their work is immediately diminished because “they must be teaching to the test” or “but what about middle school.”
Agree with this parent- I am a parent with children in DCPS, private and charter (pk-8). I am also an educator and in my role I am all over the DMV in different classrooms in different counties. I have seen some outstanding DCPS and DC Charter teachers and met some outstanding principals. I have seen some not so great situations, but that is every single county across the DMV. Teachers/ principals from DC can easily get jobs in other schools outside of DC. It's strange how there are so many education "experts" on DCUM who I guess know more about the landscape than people who are actually in it. I also taught in both VA and DC and PARCC is much harder to "teach to the test" than the SOLs. It is much more based in critical thinking and problem-solving. But, all of the education experts here would know more than me I guess.
BTW this thread is bizarre. It started with someone sharing an article celebrating schools where clearly the teachers and principals are working hard and making progress with their students and turned into a platform to bash these schools. I know how hard this job is and clearly the 14 schools listed in this article are doing something right and making gains.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are saying these at risk schools on a average have 1/5th of the kids on grade level. The celebrated schools have on average 1/4th of the kids on grade level. Let’s celebrate. Seriously?
The real question is why is only 1 out of 4 or 5 kids at grade level? If you say because it’s low SES then you are perpetuating the problem. There are cities with low SES kids doing much better.
The answer is because DCPS is a disaster with its central office, has no implementation of any effective system wide support programs, socially promote all kids, expect local principals to solve systemic wide problems at the local level with no support, and continue to burden teachers with more BS administrative things and testing.
This is why a principal doesn’t last long at the school, leave or get shuffled around to other schools because they can’t fill posts, and there is a high teacher turnover.
But yes, let’s not ask those questions and this is the best we got to celebrate.
Former DCPS employee here?
Anonymous wrote:They are saying these at risk schools on a average have 1/5th of the kids on grade level. The celebrated schools have on average 1/4th of the kids on grade level. Let’s celebrate. Seriously?
The real question is why is only 1 out of 4 or 5 kids at grade level? If you say because it’s low SES then you are perpetuating the problem. There are cities with low SES kids doing much better.
The answer is because DCPS is a disaster with its central office, has no implementation of any effective system wide support programs, socially promote all kids, expect local principals to solve systemic wide problems at the local level with no support, and continue to burden teachers with more BS administrative things and testing.
This is why a principal doesn’t last long at the school, leave or get shuffled around to other schools because they can’t fill posts, and there is a high teacher turnover.
But yes, let’s not ask those questions and this is the best we got to celebrate.
Anonymous wrote:How is it even fair to compare a charter school to a neighborhood one? So much to unpack here.